« Dodger parking problems | Main | Food fight for rail money »

Art vs movement

 

The Times' Chris Lee take an art tour around MTA facilities, and seems to like what he sees. Chris notes that all the striking installations come from a funding formula the MTA set up:

Since 1989, the Metropolitan Transit Authority has earmarked one-half of 1% of all rail construction costs toward the creation of original, site-specific artwork. So now, from Pasadena to the South Bay, Watts to North Hollywood, the MTA displays a trove of museum-worthy modern art pieces and installations at its Metro Rail stops.

More about the MTA art and some free tours. What is your favorite (BB thinks the suicide man is cool).

But it does raise a question: Would it be better for the MTA to have plainer stations and put the money into better service? Hit the COMMENT button and speak out!

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/816965/17328328

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Art vs movement:

Comments

@ Stephen:

Great idea! I can't figure out why Metro buses can have advertisements for movies and other things, but no MTA trains do. If Washington and $acramento won't give MTA the funds for sorely needed rail service expansion, why not do like those other systems and get it from private companies through ads on and around trains?

New York or Boston can get away with a fairly utilitarian system, but one thing I universally hear about the LA subway is how pretty it is, how "exquisite" it is, I love the speculation about what a BH subway station would look like, or maybe a Westwood [UCLA] stop. This isn't New York, where "if you build it they will come," and while that's certainly true to an extent here, having the stations look so nice is a draw, an attraction.

People check out how amazing the Hollywood/Vine subway station looks and all of a sudden it's a pleasant place to be, rather than just a plain old subway station. It's not the most important part of the picture for attracting people onto transit in LA, but for the comparatively low cost, having the stations look so nice is important.

Metro should look into implementing in tunnel motion advertising which are already seen on subway systems in Chicago, New York, Washington DC, Boston, Philadelphia and Atlanta. The Chicago Transit Authority generates an additional $100,000 revenue with just one motion ad on the Dearborn St Subway.
Link:
http://www.submediaworld.com/press.htm#

I happend to ride on the Red Line yesterday from NOHO to Downtown and I noticed new 10 foot art piece. The Angus burger from McDonalds.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In






Our Blogger
Steve Hymon is The Times' Road Sage. He covers traffic and transportation in a region united by a confounding network of freeways that frustrate drivers daily. The Bottleneck Blog is Steve's website home, where he breaks transportation news, reports on traffic tie-ups and brings a critical but humorous eye to commuting in Southern California. You can reach Steve at steve.hymon@latimes.com.

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
All Things Trojan
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Blue Notes - Dodgers
Booster Shots
Bottleneck
Comments Blog
Countdown to Crawford
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Extended Play
Fabulous Forum
Funny Pages 2.0
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homeroom
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Soundboard
Technology
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider
Web Scout
What's Bruin
Your Scene Blog