Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and some news from the world of health.

Virtual colonoscopy gets an endorsement

Vcolon_2Virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer has been in use in clinical trials for several years. Today, however, the technology was recommended for anyone who needs screening colonoscopy. While the test still requires what doctors politely call "bowel preparation," the new technology will be easier, safer and more comfortable for patients, to be sure.

The study endorsing widespread use of virtual colonoscopy is published in this week's New England Journal of Medicine. The largest study to estimate the accuracy of the technology, the research was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and had 1,256 participants at 15 study sites, including UCLA. The participants underwent a virtual colonoscopy followed by a traditional colonoscopy, usually the same day. The results showed virtual colonoscopy is comparable in accuracy to traditional colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy was highly accurate in finding moderate to large polyps, which are unusual growths that could be cancerous or precancerous, and even very small polyps were detected with high sensitivity.

Colorectal cancer is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer in the country and the second leading cause of cancer death in American men and women. Colonoscopy is considered the definitive test for colorectal cancer screening and prevention.

"It is our hope that this less invasive option for screening will lead more people to get screened for colorectal cancer, which would result in fewer deaths," said Dr. Peter Zimmerman, principal investigator for the UCLA study site.

Virtual colonoscopy is performed with computerized tomography -- which is why it is also called CT colonoscopy. A standard colonoscopy uses a long, flexible tube with a camera that is threaded through the colon, but CT produces three-dimensional pictures taken with the CT scanner with only a thin tube inserted in the rectum. The test could greatly benefit the 5% to 10% of people who cannot have complete, regular colonoscopies because they have abdominal lesions or a very twisted colon.

There are some caveats to virtual colonoscopy, say experts from the American Gastroenterological Assn. For one, the test is more accurate in experienced hands. Also, if a polyp is found you still have to undergo a regular colonoscopy to have it removed. Finally, CT scans emit radiation. It's not easy to assess how much radiation people might get from virtual colonoscopy, however, because the exposure varies among the types of machines used, according to the AGA.

For more information on virtual colonoscopy, see the AGA web page entitled "What is CT colonography?"

An accompanying study, also in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that people need not have a colonoscopy any sooner than five years after the last normal scan. Many doctors recommend screening colonoscopy once every 10 years after age 50. But, until this new study, there were no data to support when another exam is warranted after the first normal one. People with symptoms, such as pain or bleeding, would need exams more often, as would anyone who has a family history of colon cancer.

-- Shari Roan

Photo: Computer-generated, 3-D picture taken from a CT colon exam. Credit: AP / Courtesy of Dr. Perry J. Pickhardt, University of Wisconsin Medical School.


ADVERTISEMENT


Our Bloggers
Tami Dennis, who takes the word "skeptic" to previously uncharted territory, is the Times' Health and Science editor. She's adamant that pitches promoting awareness days, weeks or months are, by their nature, non-stories. And, because she's an adult, she refuses to use words like "veggies," "tummy" and "yummy."
Rosie Mestel, deputy Health and Science editor, studied genetics before abandoning flies, fungi and DNA for health/medical writing. Her hero is the biologist Ernst Haeckel, whose jellyfish paintings inspired snazzy chandeliers. Her favorite toast-spread is Marmite, a British delicacy made of yeast extract. Her least-favorite word is "millenniums."
Melissa Healy is a staff writer for the Health section reporting from Washington D.C. Healy's a veteran of The Times' National staff, having covered the Pentagon, Congress, poverty and social welfare, the environment, and the White House before shifting to Health in 2003. She writes frequently about mental health and human behavior, about federal health policy, prescription medication and ethics in medicine. More wonk than wellness freak, Healy chooses to believe in the health benefits of coffee and wine, and considers water a better work-out medium than beverage.
Karen Kaplan covers genetics, stem cells and cloning. She and colleague Thomas H. Maugh II comprise about 25% of the unofficial MIT-Alumni-in-Journalism Club, and she is proud to have taken more math (5) than English (0) courses in college. Her contributions to Booster Shots will, she hopes, appear more frequently than postings to her mommy blog.
Thomas H. Maugh II has been a science and medical writer at the Times for 23 years. Before that, he was on the staff of the journal Science for 13 years. He has bachelor's degrees in English and chemistry from MIT and a doctorate in chemistry from UC Santa Barbara.
After a brief stint as a sports writer, Shari Roan turned to health journalism and has covered the topic for The Times for 18 years. She is the author of three books and the mother of two daughters, both teenagers who refer to her as a "health freak." She likes to jog, watch baseball and is very happy that dark chocolate contains some health benefit.
Jeannine Stein writes about fitness, sports medicine and obesity for the Health section. She’s a gym rat from way back and never met an elliptical trainer she didn’t like. Well, maybe one or two. She tempers exercise with a steady diet of reality television because she believes it’s all about balance.