Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and news from the health world

« Previous Post | Booster Shots Home | Next Post »

Suicide barriers may not prevent people from jumping elsewhere, study finds

July 7, 2010 |  1:35 pm

Building suicide barriers on buildings and bridges seems like a good idea, but a new study finds that such obstacles may not have an effect on an area's rate of suicide by jumping from heights.

Kdp4bqncCanadian researchers examined suicide rates at the Bloor Street Viaduct in the years before and after a suicide barrier was erected. The viaduct, located in Toronto, averaged about 10 suicides a year from 1993 to 2002, prompting the building of a barrier in 2002 and 2003 to prevent people from jumping.

Coroner's records on all suicides in the province of Ontario were examined from 1993 to 2007, and researchers divided that period into the years before the barrier was constructed (1993 to 2001) and the years after the barrier went up (2003 to 2007).

The rate of suicide in Toronto by jumping from a height didn't change after the barrier was put up. An average 9.3 suicides per year occurred at the viaduct before the barrier, and none after. However, the yearly rate of suicides by jumping from bridges other than the viaduct went from 8.7 before the barrier to 14.2 after. There was a decrease in the overall suicide rate in Toronto and in the rate of suicide by methods other than jumping in the years after the barrier was built.

The authors conclude that although such a barrier may stop suicides at a specific location, it may not stop people from jumping to their deaths at similar locations.

But an accompanying editorial points out that there are arguments for putting up barriers in common jumping spots: Suicide by jumping is often impulsive, and an obstacle could stop someone from killing themselves. Also, these types of suicides often get a great deal of media attention, possibly triggering similar suicide attempts.

The editorial also noted that the number of pre-barrier suicides at the Bloor Street Viaduct may be too small to made any deductions about overall suicide rates in the area. Also, because it's not known if suicides at other bridges were increasing in the years before the barrier was built, no one can be sure what caused the overall rise in suicides by jumping after the barrier went up. Other studies have shown that constructing barriers at suicide "hot spots" may lead to an overall decrease in jumping deaths.

The study was published this week online in the British Medical Journal.

-- Jeannine Stein

The Golden Gate Bridge is a common spot for suicide attempts. Photo credit: Lawrence K. Ho / Los Angeles Times

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments (3)

So now we know definitively that: yes, these people were not picking their spot based solely on it's scenic appeal. It was altitude, not attitude, they were interested in. But let's not miss this chance to tout the wonders of California's Golden Gate Bridge.

Stray tuned for tomorrow's feature article "Study Finds That Sun Rises in East."

I've always held this view. At UC San Diego, there is an 11 story dorm, Tioga Hall. After several jumps from the sundeck, the administration erected ugly plexiglass barriers that spoil the view. But they did nothing to the easily accessable 10 story balconys at this same building, or lower floors. Plus within an 2 minute walk there are other tall buildings plus a 200 foot cliff over the Pacific Ocean.



Advertisement


The Latest | news as it happens

Recent Posts
test |  March 15, 2011, 4:00 pm »
Booster Shots has moved |  July 12, 2010, 6:02 pm »


Categories


Archives
 



In Case You Missed It...