Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and news from the health world

« Previous Post | Booster Shots Home | Next Post »

CPR with mouth-to-mouth is better for kids, researchers say

March 2, 2010 |  3:31 pm

Since 2008, the American Heart Assn. has recommended a “hands only” approach to CPR, emphasizing the importance of performing rapid chest compressions on victims of sudden cardiac arrest. The group decided to nix the mouth-to-mouth portion of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in part because studies show that it doesn’t improve overall survival, and in part to increase the odds that a bystander would perform any kind of CPR at all.

CPR But a new study finds that the old-fashioned version of CPR is more effective at resuscitating children in cardiac arrest.

Japanese researchers examined the medical records of 5,170 minors (ages 17 and younger) who were treated by emergency medical personnel for an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the years 2005, 2006 and 2007. Unfortunately, only 9% of those children survived, and even fewer – 3% – had a “favorable neurological outcome.” But the ones who got CPR from a bystander stood a much better chance of preserving their neurological function than those who didn’t – 4.5% vs. 1.9%, according to a report being published online Wednesday by the journal Lancet.

The researchers also found that conventional CPR was more likely to result in a “favorable neurological outcome” than compression-only CPR. In their analysis, 7.2% of children given chest compressions and mouth-to-mouth had a good outcome, compared with 1.6% of kids who got compressions only.

In a commentary accompanying the study, Spanish researchers say the reason is probably that most cases of sudden cardiac arrest in children – 71% in the Japanese study and more than 90% in other studies – are probably caused by non-cardiac events. (Only about a third of cases in adults are thought to have non-cardiac origins.) In such cases, mouth-to-mouth resuscitation is helpful. When cardiac arrest has a cardiac cause, either type of CPR works equally well.

They conclude that bystanders should continue to provide traditional CPR to children in cardiac arrest.

-- Karen Kaplan

Photo: These kids are participating in a disaster drill, but if it were an actual emergency, bystanders should give them chest compressions AND mouth-to-mouth, according to a new study. Credit: Glenn Koenig / Los Angeles Times

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments (2)

Both the American Heart Association and the American Red Cross still teach full CPR (compressions and breathing). I teach for both and the 'hands-only' version may be discussed but is not recommended nor taught by either.

interesting



Advertisement


The Latest | news as it happens

Recent Posts
test |  March 15, 2011, 4:00 pm »
Booster Shots has moved |  July 12, 2010, 6:02 pm »


Categories


Archives