Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and news from the health world

« Previous Post | Booster Shots Home | Next Post »

Gays make great uncles: Maybe that's why they're still among us

February 5, 2010 | 11:58 am

Evolutionary biologists have long scratched their heads over homosexuality in men: If there is a genetic component to male homosexuality--a view for which there is considerable evidence--then why has that gene persisted to this day? After all, if one were disinclined to spread one's seed in places where it would result in offspring and extend your bloodline, evolutionary reasoning would tell you that genetic propensity would disappear.

And yet they live among us--sons, brothers, dads and uncles. Especially uncles.

A new study conducted in Samoa suggests that gay men's avuncular ways--their willingness to  love, baby-sit, teach and buy toys for their nieces and nephews--may be the key to the survival of the gene that may predispose some men to sexual attraction to other men.

That's the conclusion that emerges from a study that looked at the fa'afafine of Samoa--male homosexuals, who are considered a distinct gender neither male nor female, but who live their lives integrated seamlessly into their extended families.

The study, which appeared in the journal Psychological Science compared the avuncularity--the dedication shown to nieces and nephews--of the fa'afafine--with that demonstrated by heterosexual Samoan men and heterosexual Samoan women.

Spoiler alert: If you need money, go to your gay uncle first. He may be here today because of the greater likelihood that he'll pull out his checkbook and deliver the goods. In fact, he might even drive you to the bank to deposit it, too.

Gay uncles, the study of Samoans found, have a pattern of devoting themselves to their siblings' offspring, selectively paying them more attention than they do unrelated children. Their inclination to dedicate themselves to their nieces and nephews was found by researchers to be not only greater than that of straight uncles and aunts, they also favored their nieces and nephews for attention over other kids more strongly than do heterosexual men and women.

Having such an attentive gay uncle confers a selective advantage on a child, making it more likely that a child will survive, thrive, prosper and reproduce, researchers surmised. Because of the gay uncle's availability and assumed role as "helper in the nest," researchers say, the child is more likely to grow up and carry his or her uncle's genes forward indirectly (and perhaps in an attenuated form), keeping the "gay gene" alive.

The authors of the study, Paul L. Vasey and Doug P. Vander Laan of the University of Lethrbidge, don't mention it, but the kin selection hypothesis might also help explain the oft-cited tendency for gay men to be the younger brothers in large families of males.

There are interesting biological reasons why that might so--researchers have speculated that mothers who have borne many boys may pump the womb full of female hormones to counter a build-up of androgens, and that influences the development of their brains in utero. But if gay men's evolutionary value is based on their dedication as uncles, they would have to have a passel of older brothers (and sisters too perhaps) to produce offspring for them to "uncle."   

Want to read a really vintage study on the genetic bases of homosexuality? Check this out.

And if you don't believe in evolution--or that homosexuality in men may have biological roots, but is rather a lifestyle chosen to affront--well then, this study won't help explain anything for you. Good luck finding an alternative.

-- Melissa Healy

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Comments (3)

wait so if its gay to be a good uncle?

This is evident throughout history in various cultures throughout Africa, North and South America, Polynesia and Micronesia. "Gay uncles" were part of "the village" it took to raise a child. Women gave birth to a child every year until they either died at a childbirth or for other reasons at an early age. A village might have so many children without enough parents to raise them. While the women were alive, they spent too much time nursing their smallest children to give full attention to the older children. But some of the men, who did not seek a woman to create more children, provided the care for those children. These men may or may not have also participated in the hunt for food, excused because of the help they provided in raising potential new hunters and warriors.
It wasn't until missionaries invaded the villages to teach that such a life was sinful that gays were condemned... at least while the missionaries were present.

In order to prove the validity of this finding, one would need to look at all unmarried siblings. I think if this were done, one would find little difference between gay uncles and non-gay uncles, and gay aunts and non-gay aunts. Gay uncles tend to be more attentive to their nieces and nephews because they generally have no children of their own. Once they allow more gay people to adopt, you will perhaps find that they become attentive to their own children and less attentive to their nieces and nephews. Perhaps this is why some married straight people with children oppose letting gay people adopt--it will lessen the attention given to their own children. It's funny to note that straight couples who have no children are more supportive of gay rights than their married counterparts with children.


The Latest | news as it happens

Recent Posts
test |  March 15, 2011, 4:00 pm »
Booster Shots has moved |  July 12, 2010, 6:02 pm »