Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and news from the health world

« Previous Post | Booster Shots Home | Next Post »

New gene mutation for ovarian cancer found

August 2, 2009 |  8:00 am

Ovarian cancer Scientists have identified a genetic variation that may increase the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer, according to a study published today in the journal Nature Genetics.

The DNA variation, called a single nucleotide polymorphism, is located on chromosome nine. Women carrying the gene variation on both copies of chromosome nine have a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of 14 in 1,000 compared with 10 in 1,000 among women who do not have the mutation. Women carrying one copy of the mutation have a lifetime risk of 12 in 1,000.

The mutation was discovered by researchers at the Cancer Research UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit at the University of Cambridge and University College London. They sequenced the genomes of 1,810 women with ovarian cancer and 2,535 women without the disease to find the mutation. About 15% of the women in the UK population carry two copies of the variant DNA.

Ovarian cancer is difficult to detect in its earliest stages, when it is most curable. Therefore doctors would like to have information to help women know if they are at higher-than-average risk of the disease. Some factors, such as age of first pregnancy and family history, can be used to assess risk. And women who have the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations are known to be at higher risk. Identification of other gene mutations linked to ovarian cancer is expected.

"There is now a genuine hope that as we find more, we can start to identify the women at greatest risk and this could help doctors to diagnose the disease earlier when treatment has a better chance of being successful," said the lead author of the paper, Dr. Simon Gayther, in a news release.

-- Shari Roan

Photo credit: National Institutes of Health

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Comments (1)

What do you mean, age at first pregnancy as factor? The older you are, the greater the risk, and if so, why?

If there's a genetic risk, this makes no sense and sounds to me like another reason to make women feel guilty for waiting to have kids.

Society and doctors already try to scare women over 35, and over 40 they treat you in a way that CREATES mental stress even if you're in amazing shape and WERE relaxed before you went to the doctor.

AMA "guidelines" going by age regardless of individual condition leave me highly skeptical based on my personal experience.

Worse, there's the issue that if genetic testing identifies a greater likelihood of getting something which could be expensive to treat, and with our medical records already largely computerized "at everyone's fingertips" for better AND worse -- and Obama wanting to mandate it -- this makes it easier for anyone who takes the test to be denied future coverage or have rates jacked up high.


The Latest | news as it happens

Recent Posts
test |  March 15, 2011, 4:00 pm »
Booster Shots has moved |  July 12, 2010, 6:02 pm »