What replaced all those trans fats?
The removal of trans fats from all kinds of foods is certainly good for our health. But how good? That depends on what kind of fat has replaced them.
Three doctors from Gentofte University Hospital in Denmark decided to find out. They picked 19 popular kinds of fast foods, cookies, cakes and snacks that were known to be heavy on the trans fats, then compared them with 19 similar foods with low trans fats.
Before we get to the results, a quick primer on the relative merits of different kinds of fat. Trans fats are vegetable oils with added hydrogen to make them more solid. That makes them useful to food manufacturers, but bad for people – they raise bad cholesterol and reduce good cholesterol. The more you eat, the more you increase your risk of coronary heart disease.
The same is true of saturated fats, which occur naturally in foods like cheese, ground beef and chocolate. But monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats (from fish, avocados and vegetable oils, among other items) don’t raise bad cholesterol. In fact, when used as a substitute for trans fats or saturated fats, unsaturated fats can help reduce your cholesterol.
So if food manufacturers were simply replacing trans fats with saturated fats, they really wouldn’t be making their products that much better.
And now, drum roll please ….
French fries were a natural candidate for this analysis. Fries that were low in trans fats had a corresponding increase in polyunsaturated fats, the best kind. For microwave popcorn, about half the trans fats were replaced with monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, with saturated fat making up the difference. Cakes and cookies swapped nearly one-quarter of their trans fats for the better unsaturated fats, but most of the substitution was for saturated fat. The results were published today in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The authors concluded that when trans fats were removed from foods, they really did get healthier.
Here are a few useful backgrounders on dietary fat from the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Assn.
-- Karen Kaplan
Photo: Ringo H.W. Chiu / For The Times





Ironic! It was the food police decades ago who told us to switch from butter to margarine in the interest of our health. Maybe this should clue us in to the fact that evangelistic zeal around food is not always scientifically sounds. Not to mention some transfats were replaced by GMO products. Now to wait for the side effects of these for the next few decades.
Posted by: FatNSassy | July 16, 2009 at 08:55 AM
Fatnsassy, It wasn't the food police, it was the margarine manufacturers who made those claims.
Posted by: clivus Multrum | July 16, 2009 at 11:46 AM
Point is, any fat that is solid at room temperature is bad for you (trans-fat or saturated fat) This is not a problem for foods that are already liquid but other foods like pastries and cookies can't be made well with liquid fats. Also, trans-fats go rancid more slowly than saturated fats so they would have a longer shelf life, benefitting the manufacturers...
Posted by: drew9 | July 16, 2009 at 01:54 PM
The body needs a certain amount of saturated fats (read: vitamin A and D, the fat soluble vitamins) in order to better absorb and assimilate the vitamins from other food sources. What's important is to eat QUALITY SATURATED FATS, that is, grass-fed meat, poultry and eggs, and grass-fed dairy products (milk, butter, cheese, jogurt, etc.), which are best when not pasteurized. (Pasteurization kills the vitamins and enzymes.)
Support your local farm! Drink raw milk!
Posted by: bonmot58 | July 16, 2009 at 02:43 PM