Overweight children may benefit from family interventions

Getting overweight kids to slim down is job one for many health professionals and researchers, but viable solutions to this complex problem are few and far between.

But a new study suggests that a family-based intervention — even one that only involves parents — may work in helping children slim down. The study was done in four rural Florida counties. In general, rural areas show slightly higher rates of obesity than in urban areas, and medical and preventive healthcare services are often scarce.

Researchers recruited 93 overweight or obese children and their parents who were randomly assigned for four months to one of three groups: a family-based intervention, a parent-only intervention and a control group.

In the family-based intervention, parents and children took part in separate groups. Parents received training on nutrition and exercise and ways to manage behavior, discussed their progress and took part in group discussions about any difficulties they had. Children focused on reviewing progress from the previous week, did some exercise and prepared a healthy snack. At the end of the sessions, both kids and parents met together to plan goals for the week.

Adults in the parent-only intervention went to group meetings, which was structured similarly to the parent portion of the family group, with an emphasis on goal-setting with their kids. Families in the control group went through a weight management intervention after the study’s final follow-up.

After four months, children of parents in the parent-only intervention lowered their BMI scores more than children in the family-based group. Both of these groups lowered their BMI stores more than children in the control group. After 10 months kids in the parent and family groups still showed decreases in BMI, and the BMI of children in the control group increased slightly.

The results, say researchers whose study is published in this month’s issue of the Journal of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, bode well for community-based interventions in which children may not need to be present. "There are a number of possible benefits to including only parents in treatment groups," they write in the study. "The first possible benefit is that the parent may be forced to take greater responsibility for learning and explaining strategies to adopt healthier lifestyle habits, as well as implementing those changes in the family environment." They also argue that having just parents attend regular meetings about weight control may prevent kids from being stigmatized and thus less enthusiastic about staying motivated.

The study’s authors also say that parent-only meetings may be more cost-effective than whole family interventions, something to consider in areas with fewer resources.

-Jeannine Stein

Photo credit: Gregorio Borgia / Associated Press

Comments

[Joe Jessome]

I hate say it but in many ways, people have got to take a real look at the rest of the world. And themselves.
My family is from Canada so I have a pretty good idea about the difference in socialized medicine and what we have here. Canadians have been paying over 5 dollars for a gallon of gas for as long as I can remember. A pack of cigarettes can be over $12 a pack, and every time a canuck buys a new car there is a $5000 surcharge. My sister waited 6 mos. to have her thyroid cancer operation because it was "non emergency," meanwhile the e/r is congested with lil ol' ladies who, because they don't even have a co - pay to worry about, will go down to the e/r just to visit the nice doctor. Can you see where this is going? No system is perfect. My dad says that they should charge Canadians a little bit directly just to discourage such behavior... ? I read recently that 10,000,000 uninsured Americans live in homes that make over $70,000 per year. Then we have the rampant abuse within the 3 party admin. process that makes up our current health ins. system. It can get ridiculous.
Recently my wife was asked to come back in for a third doc. visit to treat a u.t.c when it was questionable as to whether or not the second follow up visit ,which she did attend, was necessary.
Of course even though we had an in network provider, this same physician charged $150 for each visit. Not much of a volume purchased based savings there?
This is why costs are out of control. We would never use this doc. again. He is “wiggling the stick.” A doc. agrees to sign up with a particular ins. company(s), and agrees to charge the pre determined amounts, for services rendered. They agree to accept these lower amounts in exchange for the amount of business it will bring into their office. This guy wants it both ways. Guess who pays for that? That’s right, the consumer.
Also had a doc. recently charge $69 to send over an applicant’s medical records for underwriting purposes. Huh? I used to think the usual $35 was pushing it. Don’t even get me started on balance billing. No wonder premiums are too high. It is not just "greedy insurance companies." And yes insurance companies are no angels either. We do whatever we can to help our clients to keep an eye on things, but nobody is policing this system so folks need to get unified and work on it. Feel free to contact us at www.Alabama-health-insurance-1.com,www.Florida-health-insurance-1.com,www.Texas-health-insurance-1.com