Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and news from the health world

« Previous Post | Booster Shots Home | Next Post »

Gardasil -- how many girls got the shot? *

October 9, 2008 |  2:57 pm

Gardasil, which protects against various strains of human papilloma virus, has been hailed as an easy way to protect women from cervical cancer and criticized as a remedy that isn't needed in this country because regular pap smears readily pick up cervical cell changes, which can then be effectively treated. [*In an earlier version of this post, I wrote "pap smears already do a good protective job." Several readers flagged this error.] (There have also been some reports of serious side effects from the shot -- however, cause and effect have not been established.)

Given the back-and-forth, one can't help wondering how many parents have gone ahead and got the shots for their daughters since the vaccine was approved in 2006. Now the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have released the first national estimate, for 2007, in which they report that 25% of girls ages 13 to 17 received at least one shot, a coverage rate that a CDC spokesman termed "very good" for a new vaccine. (There are three shots in the complete regimen.)

The report was part of the 2nd Annual National Immunization Survey for Teens (NIS-Teen), released today. You can read more of the report at the CDC website.

In other Gardasil news, the vaccine has now been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for protection against vulvar and vaginal cancers caused by HPV 16 and HPV 18. (These two HPV types are thought to account for 40% to 50% of vulvar cancers and 70% of vaginal cancers.)

Read more about the debate over Gardasil here.

-- Rosie Mestel

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments (4)

i have to disagree with the statement that pap smears "do a good protective job". Reason being? I am 25, and have had the regular recommended paps since i can remember, all of which have come back negative-until recently. turns out, last years pap was normal, but this year? hello cervical cancer. while i have mixed feelings about young girls getting this shot, i do not agree with the statement that pap smears are good enough preventative care. it was only after a horrific biopsy did i find out that it was cancer, as pap smears are only used to see if there are any cervical discrepancies.

-Brianna

a pap smear is a DIAGNOSTIC tool, not a preventative! by the time a pap smear detects an abnormality, it's too late. the vaccine is the only way, right now - save sexual abstinence - to protect against HPV. every young woman should have it!

There is a sgnificant difference between preventing a problem and diagnosing one. Gardasil can help prevent there ever being a cancer, regular pap's can find a cancer and hopefully allow early treatment and enhance survival chances. If we have a chance to prevent any more women from cancer I can't think of a legitimate reason not to...and if only we were fortunate enough to have vaccines to prevent all cancers.

Aluminum is a well-known neurotoxin. The vaccine is injected 3 times over a 6 month period. Along with other chemicals contained in the vaccine, recipients will receive a total of 675 µg aluminum. This is more than enough to cause a variety of adverse events. Some events show up immediately, others manifest years later.

See the math and comments at

http://www.sailhome.org/Concerns/Vaccines.html#HPV



Advertisement


The Latest | news as it happens

Recent Posts
test |  March 15, 2011, 4:00 pm »
Booster Shots has moved |  July 12, 2010, 6:02 pm »


Categories


Archives