Lessons from the Amish: We're not doomed to obesity*
OK, folks, it’s time for another round of Health Lessons We Can Learn From the Amish. Four years ago we discovered that the Amish maintained super-low obesity levels despite eating a diet high in fat, calories and refined sugar. They key was their level of physical activity — men averaged 18,000 steps a day, women 14,000. That’s monumental compared to the paltry couple of thousand or so most of us eke out in a day.
A recent study revealed even more about the Old Order Amish: They maintain low obesity levels despite having a gene variation that makes them susceptible to obesity. The secret here? You guessed it — lots of physical activity.
"A lot of the Amish are farmers and participate in manual activities," says Evadnie Rampersaud, associate research professor at the Miami Institute for Human Genomics at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, and the study’s lead author (the study was done when she was at the University of Maryland). "Even household chores are intense because they don’t have the conveniences that we have." Those in the high ranges were active six to nine hours a day, others, three to four. The 711 participants in the study, published in the Sept. 8 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine, had their daily movements tracked for a week with accelerometers, devices that monitor activity.
The FTO gene, shown in other studies to have an association with obesity and high body mass index, showed up among the Amish — some had two copies of the variation, and some had none. But even some who had the double variation avoided being overweight.
"The studies show that if you have two copies of the gene and you’re incorporating physical activity in your daily life, you’re less likely to become obese," says Rampersaud. "This tells us that we’re not doomed by our genes."
But she doesn’t recommend people run to the nearest geneticist and get tested. "Obesity isn’t really determined by genetics alone, but by environmental factors as well. (This quote has been modified from the original to render it more accurate, at Rampersaud's request. The original quote was: "Obesity isn’t really determined by genetics, but by environmental factors.") We’re not doomed to become obese because we have this gene that we may or may not know about. By living a healthy lifestyle, getting physical activity, eating a proper diet, you can actually impact the final outcome." Similarly, those without the variation shouldn’t deem it a license to sit on the sofa and pig out.
Rampersaud also cautions against believing that this means people have to exercise six to nine hours a day to keep off the pounds. "You are going to have an increased benefit depending on the amount of exercise you get," she says. "But we need large scale studies in the general population to really figure this out."
In the meantime, anyone want to go out and plow the back 40?
-- Jeannine Stein
Photo credit: Dan Loh / AP
"Occam's razor" plain and simple...
Energy consumed must be balanced with energy used to maintain low levels of energy storage especially around the middle section. Personally I think mass marketing has much to do with increased appetites maybe more so than the food its self, and then throw in the fact that any activity that can be done by spending money as oppose to doing your self seems to be the growing trend over time.. well then you have your results... Evolutionary laziness.
Posted by: Daniel | September 09, 2008 at 01:56 PM
So what is the big news about this revelation? It doesn't take an Einstein to reach this conclusion.
As a farm kid raised in Iowa in the summer we ate breakfast at 6 AM, lunch in the field at 9 AM, dinner at 12 noon, lunch at 3 PM in the field, supper at 6 PM and then coffee, tea or milk and cookies at 9 PM. Every single day except Sunday. And every meal consisted of meat, potatos, gravey and vegtables.
The answer to our slimness was that we also worked our butts off all day long physically. People don't do that anymore, they live behind computers and TV sets. Our kids run around with iPods, Xboxes, etc and don't hit a lick.
Fat is what they are and what they will remain.
Posted by: dharper | September 09, 2008 at 02:04 PM
Not being obese and maintaining a high level of physical activity are all well and good, but how do Amish mortality rates or even just incidence of obesity-related illnesses (coronary problems, diabetes, etc) compare to the general population?
Posted by: Steven | September 09, 2008 at 02:42 PM
Reminds me of a guy I knew in college who had always been "fat" until he discovered what he called the "bike 30 miles a day and eat whatever the heck you want" diet.
Posted by: luke | September 09, 2008 at 02:45 PM
CONSIDERING THAT MUCH OF THE 'HEALTHY FOOD' AVAILABLE IN THIS COUNTRY IS BEING RECALLED EVERY NOW AND THEN BECAUSE OF CONTAMINANTS, HOW CAN WE CALCULATE WHAT IS GOOD OR SAFE? AND CONSIDERING THAT A MAN OR WOMAN WORKING IN AN OFFICE AND DRAINED BY WORKING TOO MANY HOURS IS IN NO SHAPE TO DO ANY 'EXERCISE', HOW DO WE QUANTIFY AND QUALIFY WHAT IS OR IS NOT 'PHYSICAL ACTIVITY'? #THE REAL WORLD DOES HAVE TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT HERE, NOT JUST THE 'GET FIRM AND TRIM' BOOKS AND TV SHOWS.
Posted by: Lee Larson | September 09, 2008 at 03:01 PM
Another ridiculous study. Take the fattest individual and restrict his/her calorie intake or increase physical activity by said fat person and you will have a thin individual regardless of genetic propensity. That's not science, that's common sense.
Everyday I see people eat like pigs at a trough and genetics are not to blame for their fattness. Gorging like a starved animal and living on a diet of McCalories and Frappucinos is causing nearly everyone around me to be exceedingly, morbidly corpulent.
Posted by: Jade | September 09, 2008 at 03:12 PM
This is revolutionary!
But it's not the only revolutionary story in the news today:
1) Working with populations in the Fjords, Norwegian scientists have discovered that climbing to a place approximately 70 to 100 feet or higher and leaping groundward, from a spot where no obstacles exist between the leaper and the ground, leads in most cases to serious injury or death.
2) A team of Harvard anthropologists, in a longitudinal study of the Yanamamo tribes of the Amazon basin, have discovered that smearing human excrement on open wounds often leads to serious infections.
3) A Princeton University economist announced today that nations that run up ever-larger deficits while printing ever more currency to cover for the practice are likely to experience (at some point) a marked devaluation of that currency.
4) Dr. Michael Rassmussen of the Rassmussen Institute of Alcoholism & Addictionology has discovered that the consumption of large quantities of alcohol (six or more ounces per day) over a period of decades tends to severely impede liver function. (NOTE: This finding was the result of a $70 billion dollar federally-funded study.)
5) After a fifty year study of Central African tribes, Dr. Sabah Delictico of Cambridge University has announced that pregnancy, a condition wherein a female homo sapiens carries a fertilized egg which becomes a foetus and an embryo, most often leads to the birth of an actual human being, thus putting to rest the notion that we are all delivered to our parents by a gigantic bird.
Stay tuned for more scientific breakthroughs!
Arlo
Posted by: Arlo Scott Kennedy | September 09, 2008 at 03:13 PM
Go Amish. I eat like a pig and work like a dog, and I am well within my acceptable height/weight ratio. No mystery there.
Posted by: Jerry/Orlando | September 09, 2008 at 03:57 PM
Does anyone else see the humor in the wording of this quote?
"But we need large scale studies in the general population to really figure this out."
"LARGE SCALE studies"...get it?
Posted by: Art Turner | September 09, 2008 at 04:00 PM
Eating has become more of a hobby or entertainment rather than a necessity in this country. People do it for fun and not for nutrients. People need to learn a little bit more self-discipline and not just in this area but in many others. Self-indulgence is the plague of our generation. It is sad to see us spending billions on programs to lose weight while people around the world are impoverished and starving. All we need to do is eat what we need and exercise more. No miracle drink/pill/machine is going to do as good a job. We should take the stairs, eat less at each meal, and put our money to better use.
Posted by: Westin Hatch | September 09, 2008 at 04:06 PM
In response to the Jade:
Maybe you are missing a point. The researchers DID NOT restrict the calories intake of the participants. This study is about how environmental factors can offset genetic predisposition to obesity. Even though the result may be somewhat intuitive, I believe this study certainly has its validity.
Posted by: Clark | September 09, 2008 at 04:15 PM
we in the south call it being "easy keepers",,,,, does not get you off the hook for being fat..... just gives some input
Posted by: sue | September 09, 2008 at 04:31 PM
The assumption is that the 'obesity gene" is an aberration and a bad thing to have. Guess what? For most of human history people had to work physically very hard for very little to eat. Those with an "obesity gene" had more efficient metabolic processing of that food; therefiore they prospered and survived better than those who didn't. Those with the gene are more fit (as in Darwin's survival of the fittest). Life's just too easy now for that kind of fitness!
Posted by: Virginia | September 09, 2008 at 04:33 PM
wow, we still need university research and articles in major news papers telling us that exercise is healthy?....
Posted by: simon | September 09, 2008 at 04:46 PM
I live in northern NY (St. Lawrence County) with an expanding Amish population wherein I have observed numerous husky (very) persons of the Amish persuasion of both sexes although more often female. Agreed the younger more active are usually slender.
Posted by: Ken Hall | September 09, 2008 at 04:51 PM
Arlo's post about fake studies is funny but off target--the real study focused on whether the effect of the FTO gene on weight is modified by exercise, not whether exercise reduces weight. Also there are no financial disclosures in the published research article, which suggests that the research was not federally funded. These findings are worthwhile but not earth-shaking. However, given the obesity epidemic (http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/trend/maps/index.htm) and the fact that most people in the US don't exercise regularly (http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/PASurveillance/StateSumV.asp), I welcome any newspaper stories that remind us of the connection.
Posted by: Scott Bartell | September 09, 2008 at 05:52 PM
This really is a breakthrough study. However, we need a lot more money for research. I would like a few million dollars to try to discover the Amish gene. I believe there may be a gene that prevents the Amish from joining our wonderful, rational, scientific society. Can't they see the light? More money for research please. We need something for our middle class kids to do. A job with a lot of money and don't get your hands dirty. Research money is the key.
Posted by: Charlie Phillips | September 09, 2008 at 06:25 PM
Everyone is fooled. The Amish eat organically and donot breath flame retardant dust in their "old fashioned" homes. Thus they are less contaminated with obesogen chemicals than the rest of us. I'm thin and eat all I can, but 100% organic only.
Posted by: dave | September 09, 2008 at 06:49 PM
The Amish don't eat high fructose corn syrup, a man made demon which has American kids and adults addicted like a heroin addict to heroin. Look up a chart. The introduction of high fructose corn syrup and the beginning of childhood obesity run hand in hand on a chrono chart.
Posted by: Steve | September 09, 2008 at 07:24 PM
A 20 year study was completed many years ago in which Irish siblings were subjects. The purpose was to determine causes of heart disease, elevated cholesterol levels, etc.. Researchers followed primarily men where one moved to the US and one or more siblings remained in Ireland. Those living in the US all had a greater degree of negative results while their brothers did not. Those in Ireland consumed a diet far higher in fats yet had normal cholesterol levels and healthier hearts, were slimmer and lived longer. Short version: Those in Ireland walked, rode bicycles, did more physical labor than their American brothers.
Posted by: Pat | September 09, 2008 at 07:44 PM
I live in Mexico, in a town with no roads and no cars. While there are certainly fat people (Mexicans, too, eat a very calorie-rich diet with lots of fats and sugar), most of the people are slim. Within the first few months there, I lost 10 lbs. and gained lean muscle mass. One thing the Amish don't use is cars ... they walk. If we all walked more and ate less, obesity would be the aberration and not the norm. We don't need science to understand that...
Posted by: Forbes | September 09, 2008 at 08:06 PM
Manual labor brings along with it another benefit besides optimal body weight, and that is superior intelligence overall. Within my teaching circles, I really don't have to substantiate what I've just claimed. No manual labor, or strenuous exercise, makes Jack a very dull boy.
Posted by: Donald | September 09, 2008 at 08:16 PM
The value of this study is that it counteracts the tendency of people to believe that genetics are destiny. Amazing developments in genetics are easily misinterpreted by many to mean that genetics completely determine what we become. While genetics have strong effects, non-genetic factors are often equally important and involve making voluntary choices. People who do not recognize that choices exist don't bother trying. Studies like this remind us to focus on what we can control rather than focus on what is beyond our control.
Posted by: Hugh Jass | September 09, 2008 at 08:46 PM
Unbelievable!! Who would EVER have guessed that a lot of hard physical work would burn calories and prevent obesity!
We need MORE studies to enlighten us!!!
More government grants for studies that uncover hidden truths like this!!
Posted by: fred | September 09, 2008 at 08:50 PM
"Not being obese and maintaining a high level of physical activity are all well and good, but how do Amish mortality rates or even just incidence of obesity-related illnesses (coronary problems, diabetes, etc) compare to the general population?"
Posted by: Steven
It's very interesting that you ask this. A century long study of the health of the Amish was done by Columbia University, and the results were just released last Thursday.
It shows that 100 per cent of the subjects enrolled in the study eventually died.
In order to verify this, Duke University will do a similar study, which will hope to pinpoint the cause of death, and why there was not a single survivor.
Results will be released on September 4, 2108.
Posted by: fred | September 09, 2008 at 09:00 PM
Go Arlo!!!!!!!
It's utterly ASTOUNDING what science can reveal!!!!!!
Posted by: fred | September 09, 2008 at 09:03 PM
The whole point is that they pretty much get 7 times more exercise than outsiders like us. It's not the food you eat. It's not your genes. It's your lazy habits. Get out more often and walk every day. There's no need for a diet plan, medications, gadgets, or anything else. Just exercise.
Posted by: becca | September 09, 2008 at 09:10 PM
ANOTHER thing they are not saying is...
The Amish...make everything from scratch...and their food isn't filled with addictive chemicals and unnatural additives that are unhealthy for the human body and mind...
The lack of "High Fructose Corn Syrup" (they fatten cows for slaughter with corn!), Hydragenated Oils, carbonated beverages, artificial colours and flavours, and Aspartame (sp)...would change anyone's health, weight, and lifestyle...for the better, without having to run a farm!
Posted by: Amy | September 09, 2008 at 09:16 PM
It's easy to blame people for sitting infront on the computer all day and hence not getting enough excercise. Our work habits have changed. The IT revolution has bought in a lot of jobs, but most of these require you to be immobile for long hours during the day infront of your computer or stuck in traffic! At the end of the day you are physically and mentally tired even though you din't do any physical activity. So where's the space for excercise?
Posted by: Priyanka | September 09, 2008 at 09:21 PM
Loved Arlo's post!
Also - if you dont want to be fat - cut down on the portions. Our lifestyles do not support the amount of sugar, cream and other fatty stuff we intake, in huge quantities.
Posted by: AP | September 09, 2008 at 09:26 PM
"WORKING IN AN OFFICE AND DRAINED BY WORKING TOO MANY HOURS IS IN NO SHAPE TO DO ANY 'EXERCISE" ???????
are you kidding me? You work 40 maybe 50 hours a week and say you have no time for exercise???? My standard work week is 84 hrs and I tend to average 95 - 100 hours in a 7 day week. and guess what! I still have plenty of time to sleep and exercise. Why is it anything slightly above the norm is considered draining and too much. The problem is that people just need to decide they are going to do the exercise instead of looking for an exscuse why they cannot
Posted by: john prowse | September 09, 2008 at 09:40 PM
But she doesn’t recommend people run to the nearest geneticist and get tested. "Obesity isn’t really determined by genetics alone, but by environmental factors as well. (This quote has been modified from the original to render it more accurate, at Rampersaud's request. The original quote was: "Obesity isn’t really determined by genetics, but by environmental factors.")
Would seem to me that modifying someone's quote means it isn't really a quote anymore. Maybe we could use this 'journalistic' technique to take Obama's words (Or McCain's) and "render (them) more accurate." Pretty lame!
Posted by: John | September 09, 2008 at 09:47 PM
Probably another reason for the low obesity rates among Amish is the fact that they don't eat processed foods - they grow and raise their own. No high fructose corn syrup, MSG, fast food, bovine growth hormone in their milk and meat - that and all the exercise of being agrarian ludites will keep the pounds off. (They're also laughing up their sleeves that we worry about the price of gasoline).
Posted by: Alpan | September 09, 2008 at 09:59 PM
ooh arlo, scott bartell just owned you bad. gosh i love comments!
---
today was 11 hours of mulching. i am drinking beer now. i feel fit.
Posted by: Jaylike Birds | September 09, 2008 at 10:00 PM
Eating healthy is pretty simple, all you have to do is THINK about everything YOU EAT.
The mind follows the body, walk instead of driving, drink water instead of sodas, eat fruit, vegetables, and nuts instead of processed snack foods.
YOUR DIET SHOULD CONSIST oF a lot of fruits and vegetable, followed by whole grains and legumes, and a little meat. That's it - as long as you think about what you are eating it is easy to stay healthy and fit.
Posted by: James Rockford | September 09, 2008 at 11:40 PM
What's so difficult to figure out? Diet and exercise... eating less (less caloric intake) is what every diet in the world tries to get people to do.
When someone says "I can't lose weight" I say its because you don't want to. If they truly wanted to lose weight they could. Don't go telling me that some people just can't lose weight. Every human, if given less to eat and more activity, will lose weight. You don't see fat people in concentration camps do you?
Posted by: Michael D | September 09, 2008 at 11:45 PM
So this is actually an energy sparing gene. Being the grandchild of peasants means I probably have six sets. My hobby in younger years was mountaineering and long distance hiking carrying a heavy pack. I would eat little. Now I ride herd on a computer 10 hours a day, weigh twice as much and have circulation problems. I eat little, mostly fruit, no snacks, no sugar, drink water. Society has no use for folks with energy sparing genes any more. We are doomed to extinction. AR wants to tax obesity.
Posted by: Ransome | September 10, 2008 at 12:09 AM
Thank you Scott Bartell for a rational response. As a scientist I get very tired of hearing scientific studies made fun of because the would-be critic completely misunderstands the significance of the research. I blame the media for reporting science the way they often do -- they are often trying to make their own interpretations of the results without expert help and end up sensationalizing a soundbite or a phrase, and in the process, they completely lose the meaning of the work. These lousy journalists and the idiots who love to read them (because, after all, they provide them a reason to live, where a reason to live is an audience for their oral flatulence) seem to hover around these websites waiting for their chances to fart publicly and driving away those who actually have some understanding of the topic and some intelligence with which to comment on it.
Posted by: Matt | September 10, 2008 at 01:54 AM
After reading all the comments everything is basically covered. One thing in particular that this country needs to realize is that with all the growth hormones and such that they use on cattle, chickens, etc. it goes into the meat (obviously) and is regularly administered...so regulates through the body. All the antibiotics/ hormones do not just dissapear from the meat once it is in the stores and on the shelves. So naturally even though you might cook it thoroughly the person consuming the food is getting the contaminated meat and possibly being affected the same way the animals were. Same with the milk, vegtables, fruits...pesticides and all that. With the Amish, they work on farms but the cattle are healthy. The world is changing into a technological world where as it used to be physical hard Labor. Kids get more lazy because child labor laws, so they don't learn to work at a younger age. Should make the future interesting to say in the least...
Posted by: Unknown | September 10, 2008 at 09:31 AM
I was traveling on a train and saw some Amish people....the ladies were well...very chubby. I guess not all Amish benefit from the fruits of hard work.
Posted by: Rick Cain | September 10, 2008 at 02:56 PM
Well, it's not only how much you eat and exercise its what you eat. 90% of the meat in US is filled with all kinds of chemicals (e.g. cows get fed a lot of pharmaceuticals, people eat the meat and drink the milk, ergo...) , the long term effects of Monsanto monstrosity GM crops hasn't been studied and of course living in city of densely placed 10 million people doesn't help either.
I'm not from the U.S. but it is odd how little people pay attention to what they eat.
Posted by: please | September 10, 2008 at 04:12 PM
IF SOMEONE WILL PAY ME LOTS AND LOTS OF MONEY, TAX-FREE, I WILL UNDERTAKE TO RUN A STUDY AND BRING FORTH CONCLUSIONS TAILORED TO FIT WHATEVER FANTASY IS IN VOGUE AT THE TIME. I'M SURE I CAN TORTURE THE TRUTH INTO SAYING WHAT IT NEVER MEANT TO SAY. THAT WORKS FOR RESEARCH SCIENTISTS AND POLITICIANS, DOESN'T IT?
Posted by: Lee Larson | September 10, 2008 at 07:24 PM
Most likely those very chubby Amish ladies were older and did not do the majority of the chores anymore. Less activity and consuming the same calories equals weight gain.
Posted by: Jeanne | September 11, 2008 at 06:14 AM