Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and some news from the world of health.

| Main |

Asthma: 'Cure is still a pipe dream'

5:14 PM, September 18, 2008

Asthma1 This week's issue of the prestigious medical journal the Lancet is devoted to research findings on asthma. But the editorial accompanying the studies is what caught my eye.

In no uncertain terms, the authors of the editorial paint a dismal picture regarding a scientific understanding of the disorder and future treatment options. In essence, what they say is that we still don't know what asthma is, who gets it and why and which factors predict its severity and response to treatment. Indeed, the very term "asthma" is not helpful, they say.

"Two years ago we made a plea to abandon asthma as a disease concept. This plea is now more justified than ever. Asthma is at best a syndrome with different risk factors, different prognoses, and different responses to treatment. Without better understanding of the underlying differences, targeted treatment effort with improved outcomes will be incomplete and prevention will remain elusive."

The special issue includes several noteworthy studies, including research showing that rhinitis is a strong risk factor for future development of asthma. Moreover, a study from the Arizona Respiratory Center in Tucson found that more than 70% of people with current asthma at age 22 and 63% of young adults with newly diagnosed asthma had episodes of wheezing in the first three years of life or the symptoms were reported at age 6 by their parents. The study shows that asthma quite often has its roots in early childhood.

The studies add to a body of evidence that asthma involves a combination of genes and environmental factors. And control of the disease is elusive for many patients. Another paper in the Lancet shows that in one population of teenagers, many had difficulty controlling their symptoms. However, if correct guidelines for treatment were rigorously applied, asthma control improved greatly.

The current guidelines, however, are 440 pages long -- not exactly user-friendly. Simpler guidelines, cheaper medications and more time spent with the doctor would go a long way to improving asthma care, the Lancet editors note. But there is a long way to go before the majority of asthma suffers receive optimal care.

"Progress in understanding asthma and its underlying mechanisms is slow; treatment can be difficult and response unpredictable, and prevention or cure is still a pipe dream. Asthma, one of the most important chronic diseases, remains a genuine medical mystery."

For information on asthma, see the web page of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.

-- Shari Roan

Photo credit: Lawrence K. Ho / Los Angeles Times

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef010534b77be6970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that referenceAsthma: 'Cure is still a pipe dream':

Comments
Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





ADVERTISEMENT


Our Bloggers
Tami Dennis, who takes the word "skeptic" to previously uncharted territory, is the Times' Health and Science editor. She's adamant that pitches promoting awareness days, weeks or months are, by their nature, non-stories. And, because she's an adult, she refuses to use words like "veggies," "tummy" and "yummy."
Rosie Mestel, deputy Health and Science editor, studied genetics before abandoning flies, fungi and DNA for health/medical writing. Her hero is the biologist Ernst Haeckel, whose jellyfish paintings inspired snazzy chandeliers. Her favorite toast-spread is Marmite, a British delicacy made of yeast extract. Her least-favorite word is "millenniums."
Melissa Healy is a staff writer for the Health section reporting from Washington D.C. Healy's a veteran of The Times' National staff, having covered the Pentagon, Congress, poverty and social welfare, the environment, and the White House before shifting to Health in 2003. She writes frequently about mental health and human behavior, about federal health policy, prescription medication and ethics in medicine. More wonk than wellness freak, Healy chooses to believe in the health benefits of coffee and wine, and considers water a better work-out medium than beverage.
Karen Kaplan covers genetics, stem cells and cloning. She and colleague Thomas H. Maugh II comprise about 25% of the unofficial MIT-Alumni-in-Journalism Club, and she is proud to have taken more math (5) than English (0) courses in college. Her contributions to Booster Shots will, she hopes, appear more frequently than postings to her mommy blog.
Thomas H. Maugh II has been a science and medical writer at the Times for 23 years. Before that, he was on the staff of the journal Science for 13 years. He has bachelor's degrees in English and chemistry from MIT and a doctorate in chemistry from UC Santa Barbara.
After a brief stint as a sports writer, Shari Roan turned to health journalism and has covered the topic for The Times for 18 years. She is the author of three books and the mother of two daughters, both teenagers who refer to her as a "health freak." She likes to jog, watch baseball and is very happy that dark chocolate contains some health benefit.
Jeannine Stein writes about fitness, sports medicine and obesity for the Health section. She’s a gym rat from way back and never met an elliptical trainer she didn’t like. Well, maybe one or two. She tempers exercise with a steady diet of reality television because she believes it’s all about balance.