Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and news from the health world

« Previous Post | Booster Shots Home | Next Post »

Steroids in shades of gray*

May 29, 2008 | 11:12 am

You’d expect a documentary about anabolic steroids circa 2008 to be heavy on the dark side of the substance — the horrific side effects when abused, how it’s infiltrating youth athletics, the way it’s ruined elite and professional sports competition, etc.

Bigger_2Don't be so quick to judge "Bigger, Stronger, Faster," a new movie debuting Friday in New York and Los Angeles (the film opens wide in June and July). Director Christopher Bell has colored the movie in a palette of grays, even presenting a credible argument that maybe steroids aren’t the devil-spawn drugs some believe them to be.

"I had two brothers on steroids during the making of the film," says Bell, a USC film school grad from Poughkeepsie, N.Y., who did a stint working at Gold’s Gym in Venice and directed the short film "Billy Jones." Bell, who does a Michael Moore/Morgan Spurlock turn and appears in the film, originally considered documenting gym culture, but his brothers were willing to talk about their own steroid use to present another side of the story. "Also," says Bell, "at the time Congress was saying it was a black and white issue, and going through my life as a power lifter and being around steroids, I knew there was a gray area, and I wanted to present it in a different way."

He has, interviewing athletes, fitness models, doctors and sports fans about their attitude toward steroids. The film presents a mixed bag of facts, emotions and misinformation that will likely have even hard-liners reconsidering their views. For example, Bell points out that different forms of steroids are legally and routinely used in healthcare, and that " 'roid rage" isn’t a well-documented medical phenomenon. And although steroids, supplements and human growth hormone have horribly tainted elite and professional sports (as financial stakes stretch higher and higher), Bell makes the case that Americans like their sports heroes big and strong, and expects them to be winners. So aren’t we complicit in this as well?"

"As an athlete," says Bell, "you invest so much time and energy into pursuing your dream, and then all of a sudden you come to a crossroads — do you throw away all that time and effort, or be the person who wins at all costs? I found people on both sides of the coin. ... We always say that cheaters never prosper, but the people who are doing (steroids) are the people who are winning. It’s hard to tell people not to do it when they’re victorious. But if we want them to stop, are we doing anything to stop it?

At the heart of the film is the toll steroid use takes on Bell’s own family. In the film, Bell’s older brother Mike (nicknamed "Mad Dog") wants a shot at World Wrestling Entertainment fame, while the younger, Mark (nicknamed "Smelly") coaches high school and competes in power lifting. Their use of the substance is a source of consternation among family members, but we see the parents cheering wildly at competitions. It’s a scenario that’s undoubtedly being played out in various forms in many families.

Bell, by the way, hasn’t budged on his stance on ’roids: "I always thought it was cheating and against the rules and that people shouldn’t do it," he says. "If people learned more about nutrition and training, they’d be way better off."

*Update: Read more Times coverage of the movie here and Carina Chocano's movie review here.

--Jeannine Stein

Photo of Mike, Chris and Mark Bell courtesy of Magnolia Films

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments (4)

I saw the film- twice- and loved it. As someone who works in the fitness industry I've longed for a voice in the crowd to rise up and present a compelling case for sanity in the face of the insanity surrounding steroids, as Chris has.

He neither villifies nor condones them. He's unlike Moore or Spurlock in that there's no real villain here, although some members of Congress and Dr. Gary Wadler do come off looking rather hysterical and/or uninformed.

You don't need to be a proponent of steroid use to be open to fair and honest discussion of their merits and demerits, any more than you aren't un-American if you question the integrity of our occupation of Iraq.

Go see the film. It will give you a new perspective on a subject that seems to be given only one from the media.

SP

This film is probably the most thought-provoking treatment of the steroids issue I've seen.

I understand what Bell was trying to do by telling his personal story, but I thought that was merely an "ok" part of the film (i.e., it could have been a little shorter). The rest of it was excellent and does a good job of advancing the discussion about performance enhancing substances in sports.

I'd love to hear what "die-hard" experts (from both sides of the fence) feel about it. Overall, I recommend this documentary for people who are interested and sports and/or America culture.

Hey, if "winning and losing" is what it's ALL about, why not use steroids? Oh, wait... "roid rage" and all the other very well documented so-called "side" effects that are actually direct effects of this stuff... Forget "win/ lose" and "cheating" arguments--they are beside the point--if one actually cares about one's physical and mental health and the potential effects of your steroid use on those around you.

Aren't a lot of senior citizens getting testosterone? That is a steroid, and that is not natural for their ages either.



Advertisement


The Latest | news as it happens

Recent Posts
test |  March 15, 2011, 4:00 pm »
Booster Shots has moved |  July 12, 2010, 6:02 pm »


Categories


Archives