Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and some news from the world of health.

| Main |

Americans thumb their nose at the food pyramid*

5:00 AM, May 8, 2008

This'll come as a shocker: Americans, it appears, are not following the rules of the government's food pyramid. They eat far too many foods high in fats and added sugars. This we learn from a study  published in the May issue of Journal of the American Dietetic Assn., conducted by researchers at the National Cancer Institute.

Mypyramid_4cAmericans don't eat enough fruits and vegetables, reports the study, which used 2001-02 data from a  government survey of thousands of Americans. And when we do eat a vegetable, it tends to be a spud. Tomatoes and white potatoes make up 46% of our vegetables, in fact. Half the spuds were eaten as chips or fries.

We eat plenty of grains -- refined grains. Only 10% are whole-grain (the government thinks the percentage should be 50% or more.)

About 51% of the added sugars in our diet come from beverages, 37% of the added sugars from sodas alone.

The researchers think nutrition professionals would do better by advising people to make good choices within food groups rather than focusing on how many servings we should get of each food group.

I went to MyPyramid.gov, site of the USDA pyramid, revamped in 2005, to take a look at its advice. There's plenty of it -- and, yes, a certain lack.

Take vegetables. According to a chart, at my age and given my gender I'm supposed to get 2.5 cups of vegetables a day. There is much information on how to do this in the "tips to help you eat vegetables" section -- even a vegetable photo gallery, with images of spinach,  lettuce, a potato, etc., so that I know what I'm dealing with. The pyramid suggests eating widely from different classes of vegetables over the course of a week. And it's got detailed charts listing just what constitutes a cup of vegetables for carrots, broccoli, cabbage, corn, beans, etc.

But nowhere that I can find does the pyramid say "eat more greens" or "pull way back on the French fries and giant baked potatoes slathered with sour cream." The absence of an "eat less" message in the pyramid has long been criticized by consumer advocacy groups

The white potato did have what almost looked like a warning label: "contains discretionary calories."  I went here and was reminded that discretionary calories are any calories you've got left over to play with once you've met all your daily goals for vitamins, fiber, minerals, omega-3 fats, protein and more -- the ones you can use to splurge on treats.

With two-thirds of the U.S. adult population classified as either overweight or obese, you have to wonder how useful the "discretionary calorie" concept is.  Even if a person eats a diet of utter virtue --choosing each food to have the maximum possible density of nutrients -- he or she only gets a couple hundred "discretionary calories" to play with. As we already knew, and as these scientists empirically show here, the U.S. population's nowhere close to doing that. 

*UPDATE: It seems the white potato is getting no respect anywhere. It's been excluded from the newly revamped U.S. Department of Agriculture's Women, Infants, and Children's program, which provides food to low-income pregnant women and mothers of young children. The program was recently changed to include fruits and vegetables (for years, carrots were the only vegetable on offer, and only to certain women) but not, however, white potatoes. The National Potato Council is none too pleased.

"I suspect that the rationale for this exclusion is that French fries made with white potatoes are already among the top three vegetables eaten in the U.S. and that nobody needs more of them," writes New York University nutrition professor Marion Nestle on her "What to Eat" blog.

   --Rosie Mestel

Image: U.S. Department of Agriculture

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e5522d2f7b8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that referenceAmericans thumb their nose at the food pyramid*:

Comments

The food pyramid guidelines, for better or worse, are a compromise between scientific knowledge, food industry lobbying, and simplifications for consumer ease-of-use. These days you're much better off using any of many diet tracking systems available on the web. I would suggest giving http://www.nutrimirror.com a try.

"37% of the added sugars from sodas alone."

Soda uses HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP

NOT sugar

Choke On It: Thanks for commenting.

High fructose corn syrup consists of the sugars fructose and glucose--still sugars, just not the sugar in cane/beet sugar, which is sucrose.
Best
Rosie Mestel

Please return to the old way. This does not cut it.

Choke On It:

Don't be snarky, especially when you don't have your facts right.

Sugar comes in many forms and under many names.

If you follow this idiotic food pyramid you land up eating a diet that's nearly half starchy stuff (like bread, potatoes, rice and pasta). No wonder people in the western world are getting so fat! (Whether it's whole grain or not makes no difference.)

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





ADVERTISEMENT


Our Bloggers
Tami Dennis, who takes the word "skeptic" to previously uncharted territory, is the Times' Health and Science editor. She's adamant that pitches promoting awareness days, weeks or months are, by their nature, non-stories. And, because she's an adult, she refuses to use words like "veggies," "tummy" and "yummy."
Rosie Mestel, deputy Health and Science editor, studied genetics before abandoning flies, fungi and DNA for health/medical writing. Her hero is the biologist Ernst Haeckel, whose jellyfish paintings inspired snazzy chandeliers. Her favorite toast-spread is Marmite, a British delicacy made of yeast extract. Her least-favorite word is "millenniums."
Melissa Healy is a staff writer for the Health section reporting from Washington D.C. Healy's a veteran of The Times' National staff, having covered the Pentagon, Congress, poverty and social welfare, the environment, and the White House before shifting to Health in 2003. She writes frequently about mental health and human behavior, about federal health policy, prescription medication and ethics in medicine. More wonk than wellness freak, Healy chooses to believe in the health benefits of coffee and wine, and considers water a better work-out medium than beverage.
Karen Kaplan covers genetics, stem cells and cloning. She and colleague Thomas H. Maugh II comprise about 25% of the unofficial MIT-Alumni-in-Journalism Club, and she is proud to have taken more math (5) than English (0) courses in college. Her contributions to Booster Shots will, she hopes, appear more frequently than postings to her mommy blog.
Thomas H. Maugh II has been a science and medical writer at the Times for 23 years. Before that, he was on the staff of the journal Science for 13 years. He has bachelor's degrees in English and chemistry from MIT and a doctorate in chemistry from UC Santa Barbara.
After a brief stint as a sports writer, Shari Roan turned to health journalism and has covered the topic for The Times for 18 years. She is the author of three books and the mother of two daughters, both teenagers who refer to her as a "health freak." She likes to jog, watch baseball and is very happy that dark chocolate contains some health benefit.
Jeannine Stein writes about fitness, sports medicine and obesity for the Health section. She’s a gym rat from way back and never met an elliptical trainer she didn’t like. Well, maybe one or two. She tempers exercise with a steady diet of reality television because she believes it’s all about balance.