Booster Shots

Oddities, musings and some news from the world of health.

| Main |

Bipolar disorder may be over-diagnosed

11:23 AM, May 7, 2008

Antidep500

One of the most controversial topics in psychiatry over the last few years centers on the questions what is bipolar disorder, and how many people have it. Estimates on rates of the disease, which is marked by periods of depression alternating with episodes of euphoria, are heavily debated. A new study, however, suggests doctors are over-diagnosing bipolar illness.

The paper, presented today at the American Psychiatric Assn. meeting in Washington, D.C, and published online in the Journal of Clinical Psychology, found that fewer than half of the people who were previously diagnosed with bipolar disorder could be said to have the disorder when strict diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (the so-called bible for diagnosing mental disorders) were applied.

The study's lead author, Dr. Mark Zimmerman of Brown University, suggests drug company advertising is leading doctors astray. Doctors tend to believe they have arrived at a correct diagnose if the medication they prescribe shows some benefit, says Zimmerman, adding:

"This bias is reinforced by the marketing message of pharmaceutical companies to physicians, which has emphasized the literature on the delayed and underrecognition of bipolar disorder..."

Or, as the author of the psych blog Furious Seasons points out: "he's saying that doctors -- you know, those rational, god-like creatures who do things based on Science --are being softened up by all those pharma ads saying bipolar is wildly underdiagnosed." Medication for bipolar often produces serious side effects.

The study is rich fodder for the just-appointed members of the American Psychiatric Assn.'s Work Group who will soon begin writing the fifth edition of the mental disorders manual. DSM-V will represent the first complete revision of the text since 1994, a period in which, psychiatric association experts note, "may prove to be the most scientifically productive era in the history of psychiatry." The final text is expected to be published in 2012. Let's hope it makes huge strides in clearing up some of the astonishing confusion surrounding bipolar disease -- along with many other perplexing questions about the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness in children and adults.

--Shari Roan

Illustration: Darren Booth / For The Times

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e5521550cd8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that referenceBipolar disorder may be over-diagnosed:

Comments

As a psychologist working in the public schools sector, I have seen these fads come and go. In the late 80's and early 90's it was ADHD. Now we see a rise in bi-polar diagnoses. The new up-and-coming diagnosis is Autism. Some of these trends are due to the whole under-diagnosis-over-dignosis pendulum the authors of various article posit. However, I see no mention of the monetary gains provided by the rising rates of these diagnositc categories. Insurance company reimbursments for psychological services often depend on the patient having a major Axis I diagnosis. I see this unfold in a particulalry insidious fashion with kids who are in forster care. They go to a neuropsychologist who diagnoses them with one of their four favorite disorders (often without any information from anyone other than the fosterparent and Case Worker) and then send them on to a geneticist for genetic testing, who sends them on to someone else and the cycle goes on and on. So instead of spending money and time on therapy and skills training where you might make a difference, we funnel it into the hands of the medical community. Some of this is purely a medicaid/insurance scam.

Now I'm no saying that there aren't people out there who suffer from these dibilitating disorders and that psychotropic medications don't provide some measure of relief from these conditions. The problem with over-diagnosis is that it doesn't bring "awareness" of these disorders and improved care. It only cheapens the condition of those that truly have a serious mental health issue (i.e. ADHD, so what, everyone's got that). Another part of the problem is that we fail to appreciate that everyone has a personality and that getting past hard times and difficult situations takes hard work not a pill. In the late sixties and early seventies it was, "what's your sign?". Soon it'll be, "what's your diagnosis".

The impact on these kids is enormous when they are given a bipolar diagnosis.

Bipolar Disorder, Bipolar Patients, Bipolar Symptoms, Bipolar Community, Manic-Depressive, Mania, Mood Swings, Mood Stabilizers, Mental Health Evaluations, Episodes

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





ADVERTISEMENT


Our Bloggers
Tami Dennis, who takes the word "skeptic" to previously uncharted territory, is the Times' Health and Science editor. She's adamant that pitches promoting awareness days, weeks or months are, by their nature, non-stories. And, because she's an adult, she refuses to use words like "veggies," "tummy" and "yummy."
Rosie Mestel, deputy Health and Science editor, studied genetics before abandoning flies, fungi and DNA for health/medical writing. Her hero is the biologist Ernst Haeckel, whose jellyfish paintings inspired snazzy chandeliers. Her favorite toast-spread is Marmite, a British delicacy made of yeast extract. Her least-favorite word is "millenniums."
Melissa Healy is a staff writer for the Health section reporting from Washington D.C. Healy's a veteran of The Times' National staff, having covered the Pentagon, Congress, poverty and social welfare, the environment, and the White House before shifting to Health in 2003. She writes frequently about mental health and human behavior, about federal health policy, prescription medication and ethics in medicine. More wonk than wellness freak, Healy chooses to believe in the health benefits of coffee and wine, and considers water a better work-out medium than beverage.
Karen Kaplan covers genetics, stem cells and cloning. She and colleague Thomas H. Maugh II comprise about 25% of the unofficial MIT-Alumni-in-Journalism Club, and she is proud to have taken more math (5) than English (0) courses in college. Her contributions to Booster Shots will, she hopes, appear more frequently than postings to her mommy blog.
Thomas H. Maugh II has been a science and medical writer at the Times for 23 years. Before that, he was on the staff of the journal Science for 13 years. He has bachelor's degrees in English and chemistry from MIT and a doctorate in chemistry from UC Santa Barbara.
After a brief stint as a sports writer, Shari Roan turned to health journalism and has covered the topic for The Times for 18 years. She is the author of three books and the mother of two daughters, both teenagers who refer to her as a "health freak." She likes to jog, watch baseball and is very happy that dark chocolate contains some health benefit.
Jeannine Stein writes about fitness, sports medicine and obesity for the Health section. She’s a gym rat from way back and never met an elliptical trainer she didn’t like. Well, maybe one or two. She tempers exercise with a steady diet of reality television because she believes it’s all about balance.