IRAN: Europeans call for action against Islamic Republic for jamming of international satellites
British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and his French and German counterparts think it's high time for Europe to step up measures against Iran for its alleged jamming of foreign channels such as BBC Persian and Deutsche Welle, which are broadcast by satellite into the Islamic Republic.
"Iran has been regularly jamming the broadcasting by satellite of a number of foreign televisions and radio stations . . . since December 2009, a repetition of its practice in the run-up to the disputed elections earlier that year," Miliband, along with counterparts Bernard Kouchner of France and Guido Westerwelle of Germany wrote in a recent letter to the EU's foreign policy chief, Baroness Catherine Ashton.
"The objective was clearly to prevent the people of Iran from freely exercising their right to information," read the letter. "We cannot remain silent. It seems to us to be essential that the European Union should make known in the strongest possible terms its condemnation of such unacceptable actions."
The three powers suggest that a declaration condemning Iran for its alleged electronic interference be adopted at the next meeting of EU foreign ministers, scheduled to be held in Brussels on Monday.
Aside from condemnation and demanding that Iranian authorities stop tampering with international satellites, the ministers call for a number of other actions, including figuring out how to un-jam the blocked satellites and pulling the plug on exports of technologies the Iranian authorities are believed to use for censorship purposes.
The French daily Le Figaro reported that potential sanctions could include stopping companies such as Germany's Siemens or Finland's Nokia from delivering technologies to Tehran that allow the interception of cellphone and e-mail conversations.
On Tuesday, Iranian lawyer and Nobel Peace Prize winner Shirin Ebadi blasted Nokia Siemens Networks, a subsidiary of Siemens and Nokia, saying the company supplied Iran with software used to suppress dissent in the Islamic Republic.
"Unfortunately, a certain number of firms support the Iranian regime in its repression and censorship," Agence France-Presse quoted her as saying on France Culture radio. "It's clearly the case with Siemens and Nokia when they send the Iranian state software and technology that it can use to monitor mobile telephone calls and text messages," she said.
Another suggestion is to boot Iranian programs from Eutelsat, the leading French satellite operator which is said to have been specifically affected by the Iranian jamming. Eutelsat carries more than 70 foreign radio and TV programs, including some from the Iranian government.
"Another measure of retaliation would be to request that Eutelsat blocks in response to the interference of Iran in international channels, IRIB's programs (Iranian state television), which it oversees the distribution of in Europe" a diplomat familiar with the matter told Le Figaro.
Iran's Arabic-language channel, Al-Alam, and the English-language Press TV, would be affected, Le Figaro's report said.
The jamming violates the principles of the International Union of Telecommunications, to which Iran is a party.
— Alexandra Sandels in Beirut
Photo:British Foreign Secretary David Miliband is one of three EU foreign ministers who want the EU to step up its measures against Iran for allegedly jamming international satellites. Credit: Derek Blair/AFP/Getty Images









It is for "jamming" times like these that the invention of shortwave radio broadcasting has proven to be of great use. That 80+ year old technology, though not the greatest for audio sound, can reach target areas thousands of miles away. Relatively easy, inexpensive and private for local listeners to access it can be fairly effective at getting around jamming. The practicality of SW was proven during WWII and the Cold War. Guess with computers, and satellites, it's too old fashioned, so BBC and the others won't use a little common sense and turn their transmitters back on? In the meantime let the EU and the U.S. keep begging the IRI to comply with media access laws.
Posted by: Z.B. | March 27, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Iran is a religious theocratic dictatorship which has threatened to wipe out a member of the U.N., and who persecutes religious minorities and arms terrorist groups around the world. They are against freedom of speech, assembly and human rights. Not to mention their own battle within, of the Shiite majority versus Sunni and Sufi Islam.
We stand with the common folk of Iran who want the same things that people around the world want... a decent life free from fear and want. How they go about it is their business, but when they start building nuclear bombs, and training others to build I.E.D.s to kill or main american soldiers, and voicing a message that their religious duty is to kill unbelievers, they will reap the whirlwind and be confronted by western civilization. I say make them watch South Park. They will crumble like cheese.
Posted by: masterpuff theater | March 19, 2010 at 11:01 AM
In absolute disagreement with Bernie. Al Jazeera and other channels are already freely available in Europe, so why should we accept our point of view is not available in these countries. If it didn't treathen the iranian government, they would not spend time and effort to jam, you know....
Posted by: Christian | March 19, 2010 at 09:36 AM
Wow, I didn't know we have someone here who is actually from Iran's government commenting here.
Don't feed the troll.
Posted by: Ed C. | March 19, 2010 at 09:32 AM
More pretentious hypocrisy from the West. Iran has to accept our broadcasts, our spies, our political vision of the world order or suffer sanctions. Iran has "put a lid" on developing their version of the world order or suffer sanctions. What if Iran or China launched communications satellites and started beaming their programming into the U.S. airwaves? Ya' think we wouldn't jam them if only to protect the Wall Street interests in ABC and CBS? This is why the West is always at war with someone - an ugly double standard that only works because we're usually able to send in the troops.
Posted by: Bernie in Studio City | March 19, 2010 at 08:19 AM
How nice of European to care about Iranian people after stealing their oils and lands for last several centuries, why I'm not convince that their sudden care for Iranians are genuine now!
Iran to Europe, keep quite and let your boss (USA) do the talking :)
Posted by: Tokyo Rose | March 18, 2010 at 07:48 PM
I prefer the idea of jamming Iranian broadcasts. Their government and military communications could be disrupted at inconvenient times as well.
Posted by: ALandofnorain | March 18, 2010 at 04:44 PM