| Main |

IRAQ: Deal or no deal?

The ongoing saga of U.S. and Iraqi attempts to hammer out a deal on the future of American forces in Iraq has taken a new twist with Prime Minister Nouri Maliki's declaration Monday that he won't accept any plan that does not include a withdrawal date for U.S. soldiers.

Maliki made his comments to a gathering of tribal leaders, and while some of it may have been grandstanding aimed at bolstering support, it was the first time the prime minister had publicly demanded a withdrawal deadline. As for the deadline, Maliki said U.S. and Iraqi negotiators had agreed on the end of 2011.

His comments make clear that Maliki is throwing down the gauntlet as time runs out for some sort of deal to be struck. The United States has insisted it does not want a withdrawal deadline. Any dates for troop departures must be contingent upon security conditions in Iraq being suitable for a handover to Iraqi control, according to the United States.

Maliki made no mention of the withdrawal deadline being dependent on security conditions or on anything else. "Foreign soldiers will stay on the land of Iraq ... only for a limited timeframe and not an open one," he said in his boldest statements yet on the contentious issue.

Iraq's parliament has to approve whatever deal eventually is drafted, and it is expected to take up the issue when it reconvenes after summer break on Sept. 9. It only has until Dec. 31 to approve something, because that's the date the United Nations mandate governing the U.S. presence here expires. If Iraq and the United States can't come up with a new plan that is acceptable to the parliament here, it would effectively leave U.S. forces without a legal reason to be in Iraq.

--Tina Susman in Baghdad

P.S. The Los Angeles Times issues a free daily newsletter with the latest headlines from all over the Middle East, as well as the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. You can subscribe by logging in at the website here, clicking on the box for "LA Times updates," and then clicking on the "World: Mideast" box.

Del.icio.us!
TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c630a53ef00e5545530c98833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference IRAQ: Deal or no deal?:

Comments

The reason why Bush doesn't want a deadline for the withdrawal of United States troops can be summed up in one word: OIL. His buddies in the oil companies want US troops in Iraq to guarantee that they get a sweetheart deal.

Hmmmmm....how would we have handled this in Viet Nam? Put a bullet in Miliki's brain and replace him with one of "Our" guys.

Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In







Mideast Newsletter

Subscribe to World: Mideast, The Times' free daily e-mail newsletter on the Middle East.
Complete coverage of Iraq, Iran, Israel and the rest of the Mideast from Times correspondents.

Middle East blogs

Iraq blogs

Iran blogs

Israel/Palestinian Territories blogs

Egypt blogs

Jordan blogs

Lebanon blogs

North Africa blogs

Persian Gulf blogs

Syria blogs

To be considered for the blog roll, please submit a link to your website to latimesmiddleeast@gmail.com.

All LA Times Blogs

All The Rage
American Idol Tracker
Angels Unplugged
Babylon & Beyond
Big Picture
Booster Shots
California Consumer
Comments Blog
Company Town
Culture Monster
Daily Dish
Daily Mirror
Daily Travel & Deal Blog
Dish Rag
Dodger Thoughts
Fabulous Forum
Gold Derby
Greenspace
Hero Complex
Homicide Report
Jacket Copy
L.A. at Home
L.A. Land
L.A. Now
L.A. Unleashed
La Plaza
Lakers
Money & Co.
Movable Buffet
Opinion L.A.
Outposts
Pop & Hiss
Readers' Representative Journal
Show Tracker
Technology
Ticket to Vancouver
Top of the Ticket
Up to Speed
Varsity Times Insider