Envelope Directors Roundtable: When a scene doesn't work
What does a director do when a performance just isn't working? Recasting the part could be "calamitous," one filmmaker says.
How honest should you be when a scene -- or an entire performance -- just isn't working? Do you go with honesty is the best policy or soft-pedal the hard truth a little?
For one director, it all comes down to this: "Don't cast a brain surgeon to play a brain surgeon."
At the Envelope Directors Roundtable, Ben Affleck ("The Town"), David Fincher ("The Social Network"), Lisa Cholodenko ("The Kids Are All Right"), Ethan Coen ("True Grit"), Darren Aronofsky ("Black Swan") and Tom Hooper ("The King's Speech") addressed those questions, with some often entertaining answers.
RELATED:
The Envelope Directors Roundtable: Actor-director relationships
The Envelope Directors Roundtable: Ben Affleck on being an actor-director
The Envelope Directors Roundtable: Shaping the story [Video]
Envelope Directors Roundtable: The managed compromise
Envelope Directors Roundtable: Fighting for your film
-- John Horn






Apparently, Tom Robertson has never seen Animal House.
Posted by: Ken | March 03, 2011 at 06:50 PM
Christopher Nolan should have been included in this roundtable.
Posted by: Angelo Mateo | February 09, 2011 at 11:22 PM
Fascinating. David Fincher could not finish a single thought without starting a new one. This is a guy who tells actors what to do? It's absolutely hilarious to watch the other directors being completely confused by what Fincher is saying as he tries to explain how to make things less confusing for an actor. Hey, and what's with the pretentious hoodie that Fincher is wearing? It actually has the word "college" printed on it. Does anybody realize that the guy actually never went to college. How friggin' pretentious is that?
Posted by: Tom Robertson | January 29, 2011 at 02:01 AM
It must have been difficult directing a movie about such a vile person as Mark Zuckerberg.
Posted by: John Meyer | January 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM
And WAITING FOR SUPERMAN, the propaganda hit piece on teachers and their unions WASN'T EVEN MENTIONED, the Academy responding that the film was an exaggeration of the benefits of charter schools...
I guess the Academy is more aware than I thought, for poor ol' Davis Guggenheim has been shopping THIS TURKEY around for a nomination since AUGUST!
Quelle dommage, Davis -- YOU LOSE! Try a REAL documentary next time -- and stick to climate change science... NOT corporate funded hit pieces on teachers and their unions....
Posted by: Shlomo von Glickstein | January 25, 2011 at 11:00 AM
I would just like to thank whoever was responsible for putting this discussion online. In my opinion what these people do is some sort of wizardry and, although I will never comprehend it completely, just getting a glimpse of their minds and their thoughts about it was entertaining and informative.
I am a big fan of the Coens and Aronofsky, so it was great to see and hear them talk about 'the process'.
thanks again,
rico
Oaxaca de Juarez
Posted by: Rico | January 24, 2011 at 09:19 AM
If it works, it works. If it doesn't, it doesn't. Over analyzing why something works or does not work will just cause all of the participants of these round table discussions to end up like a bunch of Woody Allens.
Posted by: Big Sam | January 23, 2011 at 12:49 PM
I second, PLEASE post the full video. This is such an invaluable learning piece.
Posted by: Jack | January 23, 2011 at 10:40 AM
Like last year, I am going to beg for you to post the full movie of this roundtable after you finish with this "excerpts" nonsense. Last year's clips really left behind a lot of the banter and interaction that was so clear in the full printed transcript.
Posted by: JTag | January 22, 2011 at 08:45 PM