Awards Tracker

All things Oscars, Emmys, Grammys and Tonys

« Previous Post | Awards Tracker Home | Next Post »

Did Roger Corman deserve his honorary Oscar?

93068273 Rock scribe and genre movie writer extraordinaire David Konow directed me toward this lively debate on Cinematical in regard to whether producer-director Roger Corman's long and colorful career merited his honorary Oscar at the 2009 Governors Awards ceremony on Nov. 14. Both sides of the argument have their points -- yes, Corman's cinematic output has frequently lacked a certain degree of polish (or taste), but for many viewers, they're also pure, unfettered entertainment, and he's served as the launching pad for countless top directors, writers and producers (the list is endless, but a basic rundown includes Francis Ford Coppola, Martin Scorsese, Ron Howard, Jonathan Demme and James Cameron). 

My two cents, for what they're worth: I fall on the side of Corman deserving the Oscar. In addition to the reasons mentioned, his New World Pictures distributed numerous arthouse features in addition to its drive-in fare during the 1970s, including films by Akira Kurosawa ("Dersu Uzala"), Francois Truffaut ("The Story of Adele H.") and Ingmar Bergman ("Autumn Sonata") in a period where these established legends were struggling to find a foothold in the American market. I'd also argue against the notion that Corman's directorial output lacks an aesthetic; his Poe adaptations, especially "The Masque of the Red Death" and "The Tomb of Ligeia," are fairly drenched in atmosphere for such budget efforts. And I'd offer this final thought: Corman's films, both good and bad, have inspired and influenced countless writers, directors, producers, makeup artists, actors and other creative and technical talent to look at the process of making a movie as less of an insurmountable hurdle that can be overcome only by the insider elite but as a series of challenges that anyone with ingenuity, determination, and desire can surpass. And for that alone, the man deserves his Oscar. 

Having produced "Death Race 2000" is a pretty good reason too.

-- Paul Gaita

Photo: Roger Corman. Credit: Getty Images.

More from The Envelope:

Oscars in November: A brand new kickoff to awards season

Early Oscars are presented to 4 honorees

Top Movie Turkeys of 2009

Comments () | Archives (3)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Roger Corman was not a B Movie director, he never made a B movie in his life. Sure, he made monster pictures, and sci-fi pictures for little to no money but they never played on the B run at any drive ins.

If you look beyond these films to the Poe adaptations, The St Valentines Day Massacre and particularly The Intruder, maybe the bravest and honest film ever made, you'll find a Director who was not only prolific, but passionate about cinema and, more importantly, getting films made.

The film industry of today is crying out for another Roger Corman. The Oscar is completely deserved.

Why wouldn’t hollywood give the B-movie director of all time a Oscar? Since that pretty much sums of the American Film Industry today.
Oscars don’t mean anything since American films have stopped meaning anything.

Just a ‘gold- plated’ hunk-o-junk,
from ‘gold-plated’ Hollywood.

Anyone who believes that Roger Corman doesn't deserve his honorary Oscar® has their collective heads buried in the sand.

Without him, there's be no Ragin Bull, The Terminator, no T2: Judgement Day, no Apollo 13, no Godfather I & II, no Silence of the Lambs, no Rachel Getting Married,no Aliens, no True Lies, and on and on [we'll forgive him Titanic, though...].

And many of the films he directed and/or produced are classics of certain genres: the Poe adaptations mentioned above, Death Race 2000, Battle Beyond the Stars [Seven Samurai in Space], Not of This Earth, Machine Gun Kelly, and many more.

It's not the case that he doesn't deserve his Oscar® - it's amazing that he hasn't already gotten one!


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...

Stay Connected:

Recent Posts