Musings on the culture of keeping up appearances

All the Rage

« Previous Post | All The Rage Home | Next Post »

The $230 Givenchy jelly sandal and other uber-pricey rubber shoes

It all started last year with a pair of $150 jelly (shoe-speak for "rubber") sandals from Givenchy, embossed with the brand's familiar square, interlocking logo.

"Jellies," which debuted in the 1980s and were made infamous in "The Big Lebowski" as the footwear of choice of Jeff Bridge's slacker character, the Dude, have historically been available for around $10 at the local drug store. 

But okay, the designer sandals were cute, well-made (for rubber) and comfortable. And they made for comparatively cheap label-flaunting.

But now things have gotten slightly out of hand. This summer, Givenchy is pushing a new model of jelly sandal — featuring a strip of chain across the toes — priced at a whopping $230. The Chain-Detail Jelly Sandal is, design-wise, much like its predecessor, with its gladiator-style, ankle-buckle styling. So are we to presume that the "chain detail" justifies its $80 price hike? Suspect, indeed.

And, unfortunately, other designer brands have followed Givenchy down this overpriced-rubber-shoes path (though they haven't been so bold as to bust the $200 price barrier).

See by Chloe has a $150 bright-pink gladiator jelly on the market, Salvatore Ferragamo is selling a sparkly, girlish clear jelly for $140 and Stuart Weitzman has the "Blingy Peep-toe" clear jelly sandal currently on sale for $110.60 at Bloomingdale's, down from $158. 

I, for one, will be scoring my summer jellies from a sidewalk barrel in Chinatown — for around the same price as an In-N-Out burger.  

--Emili Vesilind

Follow All the Rage on Facebook and Twitter

Photos, from left: Salvatorre Ferragamo sandal, $140; See by Chloe sandal, $150; Givenchy sandal, $230. Credit: Bloomingdale's.

Comments () | Archives (6)

The comments to this entry are closed.


Whoever pays that kind of money for plastic sandals doesn't deserve either

You've got to be kidding me!! Two weeks ago Image promotes/features lucite--PLASTIC PETROLEUM PRODUCT--jewelry at asinine prices, and today they promote/feature $230--because they are Chanel?--PLASTIC PETROLEUM PRODUCT--shoes!!

Wake up people. Petroleum products are killing the planet--and US. There is a need for plastic in some cases but really, does anyone NEED plastic shoes, plastic furniture, plastic forks, ad nauseum?

If we become more MINDFUL about our insane waste of natural resources and the type of chemicals we promote by our consumption, we can help our planet heal and by extension ourselves. How many plastic shoes are floating in the Gulf?

Shame, shame, shame on the Times for promoting this irresponsible use of our resources.

$10 bucks says Ms. Vesilind doesn't approve my anti-petroleum product, $230 shoe comment.

I'll buy them when the price come down to $20. Ha ha ha!

Those shoes used to give you the foot funk, back in the stinky Reagan 80s.


Recommended on Facebook


In Case You Missed It...


Tweets and retweets from L.A. Times staff writers.