Sarah Palin's $150,000 Wardrobe Malfunction?
Sarah Palin, small-town hockey mom and everywoman? More like Sarah Palin, pampered princess. Jeanne Cummings at Politico reports that the RNC’s monthly financial disclosure reports reveal that the Republican National Committee has spent tens of thousands of dollars on the vice presidential candidate's wardrobe and accessories since she was nominated, including $150,000 in September alone.
So it seems you can take the girl out of the beauty pageant, but you can’t take the beauty pageant out of the girl.
Palin's clothes came from retailers such as Saks Fifth Avenue, Macy’s, Bloomingdales, Neiman Marcus and Barneys New York, and expenses included nearly $5,000 for hair and makeup. Maybe this is actually her one-woman economic stimulus plan. Lord knows the retail sector needs it.
Still, voters must find it unfathomable for Palin, who has been presented as a woman “like us,” to spend that kind of money on clothes in these difficult financial times, to see her speaking so passionately about Joe the Plumber while plumbing campaign coffers for Valentino jackets and pencil skirts. And yet, they’ve eaten it up, tittering on chat sites about Palin’s Kawasaki eyeglass frames and her Naughty Monkey red peep-toe pumps. (See our earlier take on Gov. Palin's style here.)
Palin’s spokewoman is saying this is much ado about nothing, that we should be talking about more important issues. But can you imagine the outcry if it were revealed that Hilary Clinton’s rainbow of pantsuits was paid for by campaign contributions? Or if college kids’ $50 checks to the Biden/Obama campaign were putting those men in $5,000 custom suits? (Obama’s suits are by Hart Schaffner Marx out of Chicago, and cost in the $1,500 range.)
In Palin’s defense, being a woman in the public eye has its own kind of pressures. And it’s unlikely she has been stepping off the campaign trail to join the ladies who lunch for shopping sprees at Neimans. Instead, she is probably working with a wardrobe stylist, who brings her things to try on and choose from. But the issue of clothing and hair expenses has always been a land mine for politicians (John Edwards' $400 haircuts), and someone should have been sensitive to that.
You also have to wonder how it feels, as a woman, to have everyone know that you really have been dressed up and trotted out like a beauty queen for the American public to wag their tongues at. Caribou Barbie indeed.
-- Booth Moore, Los Angeles Times Fashion Critic
Photo: Republican VP candidate, Gov. Sarah Palin at a campaign rally in Carson, California on October 4, 2008. Michael Robinson Chavez/Los Angeles Times.












What the heck does this have to do with the issues affecting our country? This is a typical left wing biased media article. Way to get to the serious journalism!
You are a socialist idiot!
Posted by: Scott | October 22, 2008 at 09:48 AM
How much did Obama spend renting Denver Stadium "to make himself look good"?
Or is that racist to ask Obama any questions?
This whole one sided rooting by the media is ridiculous!
edge.
Posted by: edge | October 22, 2008 at 09:49 AM
YOU ARE LIBERAL IDIOTS!!! OBAMA IS OUT SPENT ANYONE IN THE HISTORY OF POLITICS! IDIOTS YOU ARE!!
Posted by: BILL SHAW | October 22, 2008 at 09:49 AM
These types are all the same. You knew it was coming.
Posted by: Davis | October 22, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Oh come on now! You can't be that short of news in the West and of all places LA. Anyway, this made me laugh and I thank you for that.
You don't want to labelled as 'sexist" so we'll be expecting the next article to be on "The Suit's and Stylists of Barak, John and Joe. We want to know the number, labels, tailor, hair dresser, or wig maker.
Posted by: Tom | October 22, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Sarah Palin is turning out to be every Republican's worst nightmare: a welfare queen. But say, that girl do look nice . . .
Posted by: Achshav | October 22, 2008 at 09:50 AM
I FEEL SO BETRAYED I DONATED SOME MONEY TO THE MCCAIN CAMP HE PULLS OUT OF MICHIGAN SAYING LACK OF FUNDS AND BUT ALL THIS MONEY ON THAT DUMB LADY SORRY MCCAIN YOU JUST LOST ANOTHER VOTE I FEEL SO BETRAYED YOU ARE NOT A MAVERICK YOU ARE A WOLF IN THE SHEEPS CLOTHES SORRY BUT I THINK OBAMA DESERVES MY VOTE
Posted by: SURAJ CORDA | October 22, 2008 at 09:50 AM
Who says journalists don't investigate any more? The newspapers are getting to the bottom of Sarah Palin's clothing costs. No news yet on Barack Obama's dealings with Rezko or Ayers, or how his wife nearly tripled her six figure income at a hospital when became a US Senator and then got earmarks for it. But first things first, I'm sure.
Posted by: Hank | October 22, 2008 at 09:51 AM
The LA Times demeans Sarah, a real shocker. This paper hasn't said a positive word about anything that isn't left wing in years. Credibility is laughable. It should be the Oboma times. Who are they going to insult with a full on lib congress and pres. ?
Posted by: Denfenster | October 22, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Chalk yourself up as a sexist attacker. Ever look into other politicians spend rate for atire?? Didn't think so..... This is what Obamaites are all about - misdirection from the real issues, no real plans or answers.
Posted by: rks | October 22, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Are you kidding me.. Don't we have other things to talk about. You know that women's clothes cost way more then mens and that every women is judging her for her clothes. Granted they may cost a lot, but how many suits have McCain and Obama gone through over the last two years, and yes $1,500 per suit is not relevant either.. Will somebody please talk about issues like taxes and growth and stop worrying about stupid crap like this.
Posted by: Michael Brennan | October 22, 2008 at 09:51 AM
Why the bad rap. Do you want your vice president to look like hillary?
Posted by: someone | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Reminds of of the $2,000 haircuts that Al Gore used to get while on the campaign trail.
Am I the only one that thinks that the tone of this article is, at best, catty and irrelevant and perhaps may even be an inept editorial attempt at petty partisan politics?
Posted by: Andy McLean | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Is it just me, or is Sarah Palin the embodiment of PEGGY HILL?
Posted by: AweStruck | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Sarah calls herself a "Walmart mom". She should've shopped at Walmart, save some $$$ and passed it to her friend, Joe the Plumber.
The mainstream media should be more forceful in unmasking the hypocrasy of the republicans.
Posted by: J T | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
There must not be anything important happening in the U.S. for this story to be considered real news. This would never pass the Ida Tarbell test for serious journalism.
Posted by: Karen Riley | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
I can't imagine getting all dolled up like that just to sling mud.
Don't get any on you.
Posted by: Steve | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Seems to me this is just proof that the GOP knows how to treat a woman better then the Democrats do.
Posted by: Christopher Tracy | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
If I were trying to get a job of that magnitude, I'd spend that much on my wardrobe!
Posted by: KMason | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
And where do obama and biden shop. both sides or else its not worth reading....
Posted by: notworthreading | October 22, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Indeed. How can any small contributor to their campaign reconcile the fact their money is being wasted on such extravagance? I can't wait until 5 Nov, when this baloney is over and Obama takes charge. Palin will be nothing but a memory.....
Posted by: JRG | October 22, 2008 at 09:54 AM
And where do obama and biden shop. both sides or else its not worth reading....
Posted by: notworthreading | October 22, 2008 at 09:54 AM
Only happens in America, GOD bless America.
Posted by: dumbak | October 22, 2008 at 09:55 AM
No kidding! She definitely does not represent ME -- not her views, values, ideals, or wardrobe!
Posted by: Am | October 22, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Why is it even a story that a political party whose members took the lead in giving $700 billion of taxpayer's money to hedge fund adminstrators and bankers might be spending $150K a month on Sarah Palin's wardrobe?
Posted by: John Mills | October 22, 2008 at 10:07 AM
Thanks Booth, my feelings exactly.
Posted by: Jon | October 22, 2008 at 10:08 AM
I thank God that in two weeks we won't have put up with this bimbo any longer. She won't be back in 2012. There will have been too many scandals and unwanted pregnancies.
Posted by: danstpaul | October 22, 2008 at 10:08 AM
Typical political spin, speak in public about how down and out poor "Joe the Plumber" is while running wild with the tax payers credit card, she is out of touch. And yes, it is the tax payer footing John McCains campaign costs so you and I are paying for her shopping. Maybe she's working on her life after politics, wanting her own American Express card commercial. The RNC should have just hired Tina Fey, it would have cost less and certainly be less embarrassing. At least Tina Fey doesn't sound like an imbecile when she opens her mouth.
Sarah Palin talks a good game but in practice she does the same as ever other politician. Today's headlines indicate that she abused her role as Governor charging travel expenses for her kids to attend functions at the tax payers expense. Later having to "amend travel documents" to justify their travel. Seems like more of the same.
Maybe the early references to putting lipstick on a pig were actually a preemptive strike by the GOP to paint her as something other than what she really is?
Posted by: Mark Simpson | October 22, 2008 at 10:16 AM
Here is the spin:
"It was always the intent that the clothing go to a charitable purpose after the campaign" (McCain-Palin spokesperson Tracey Schmitt).
HaHa! What are they going to do, put them on eBay?
What a waste of energy and natural resources. Why not just shop at a reasonably priced store (or a thrift or vintage one) and donate the SAVINGS to a worthy cause - like say, paying for Palin's kids to go traveling with her?
Buying and using "Vintage" is better for the environment than buying new (if the item serves a purpose), yet the person who buys it new should get as much use as they can out of it first. Otherwise, it causes a lot of waster b/c of the energy needed to 'recycle' the item.
Posted by: Aimi's Collectibles | October 22, 2008 at 10:16 AM
Anyone with a wife knows they would do the same thing given the chance haha...
Posted by: T1000 | October 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM
$150,000??? I've made that much...over the course of the past 7 or 8 years...
Posted by: D Selwyn | October 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM
"I should say this, that Pat doesn't have a mink coat. But she does have a respectable Republican cloth coat, and I always tell her she'd look good in anything." Richard Nixon
Posted by: dave | October 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM
"Palin’s spokewoman is saying this is much ado about nothing, that we should be talking about more important issues."
Oh, NOW they want to talk about important issues... Well, they can start anytime now. Though I won't be holding my breath
Posted by: T-Bone | October 22, 2008 at 10:18 AM
You'd think she'd have enough moose pelts to create her own outfits.
Posted by: Niles Coventry | October 22, 2008 at 10:18 AM
Donate it to charity?
After November 4th, watch for a bag lady in 5000$ knee high gogo boots, pushing a shopping cart full of plastic bottles down Broadway. She'll still be half-blind from drinking rubbing alcohol to treat her schizophrenia...
But she will have nice, sexy boots.
Posted by: Blip | October 22, 2008 at 10:18 AM
It's Obama's fault. The fact that he is a "socialist" is so distressing to Sarah that she has to regularly indulge in some retail therapy to relieve the stress.
Anyone against Sarah wasting donation money at Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue is anti American and probably a terrorist.
Posted by: Joe The Whiner | October 22, 2008 at 10:18 AM
It's Obama's fault. The fact that he is a "socialist" is so distressing to Sarah that she has to regularly indulge in some retail therapy to relieve the stress.
Anyone against Sarah wasting donation money at Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue is anti American and probably a terrorist.
Posted by: Joe The Whiner | October 22, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Are you kidding me, is that all you got today. Where she gets her clothes, you are really reaching. Is it OK that Obamas wife eats Iranian caviarto celebrate and nothing is said. Or Biden saying we are going to have a crisis in the first 6 months of Barrack Hussains term and again nothing is said. You libral news iddiots are never going to learn. The plumber asks a question to the all mighty Barrack and he is chastised and riddiculed but all you have to say is Palin gets nice suits. You are a bunch of libral people with blinders on, if he gets in you will regret it and be saying I didn't vote for him. Please get real.
Posted by: tommyg | October 22, 2008 at 10:19 AM
I support Obama and don't think too highly of Sarah Palin from what I see in the interview and debates. I don't watch TV, so I haven't seen any of those ads, so my opinion is formed solely by the debates i watch on cnn.com. Anyway, I think this article is a little petty. This lady is running for the 2nd highest office in the land, and it's a big stake. What is wrong with looking your best? And face it, look does matter. Even conman tends to come in suits instead of rags! I thought she look horribly old and out of fashion when she appear in katie couric and that hurts her (in my eyes at least). They did a better job of presenting her in the debates, and it's good on them.Yeah we should be talking about important issue, and that extends to the journalist as well! Why talk about her clothes instead of her policy? I think this article is rather petty and nitpicking.
Posted by: PP | October 22, 2008 at 10:20 AM
My 35-yr-old sister just had to close her business that she's thrown herself into over the last 7 years. She just lost her car a couple months ago. And now she is on the verge of losing her house, too. In the last cross-state family visit, she took off her shoes and I was saddened to see that her socks had holes in them. My Mom commented, and my sister replied that she did not have money for socks.
As my sister approaches Winter in Michigan with socks that have holes in them, I am very pleased to see that hundreds of thousands of *our* TAXPAYER dollars are being spent on Palin's clothing, hair and makeup.
I've worked in business and wore full suits every day of the year, yet I only spent $1,200 per YEAR on business clothing. Certainly, Palin could have ''squeaked by'' with a $5,000 wardrobe to get her through 2 months of campaigning, don't you think?
I think my sister would be glad to take Palin's hand-me-downs when Palin is done with them. My sister is bit taller than Palin, but has lost a lot of weight lately because she does not have money to eat very much. I think some of Palin's stuff would fit her.
Posted by: LadyPatriot1776 | October 22, 2008 at 10:20 AM
If you put designer clothes on an Alaska hockey mom...
....she's still a moron.
Posted by: mamasezobama | October 22, 2008 at 10:24 AM
Isn't it funny how people take issues with out of context phrases such as "bitter" as opposed to living examples such as price tags of items paid for by donators I'm sure not meant for such attire.
Isn't she receiving a SPREAD OF WEALTH???
1st Cindy McCain and not Sarah Palin.
They don't want the wealth spread around otherwise they wouldn't have anything to enjoy.
McCain/Palin = The Penguin/CatWoman. LOL!
Posted by: Greg | October 22, 2008 at 10:24 AM
"Caribou Barbie" Love it!
Posted by: tmg | October 22, 2008 at 10:25 AM
If the wealthiest 1%-5% of Americans actually spent money like the McCain campaign is instead of excessively hoarding it, McCain's arguments for trickle down economics might actually make sense. In reality, the wealthiest 10% of Americans have hoarded assets to the point where they now control 71% of the nations' wealth, with the top 1% controlling 38% of it. The money just isn't trickling down and for this reason, McCain's economic policies represent a dismal failure that will only ensure that the poor and middle class get poorer while the rich gets even richer.
Posted by: hesingswithfrogs | October 22, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Sarah has to endure the main stream media ridicule while trying to look hot for all the Joe six-packs that the NeoCon Gingrich controlled GOP hope to catch with this AK Salmon Egg for bait at the end of their fishing poll.
Hypocrisy never looked so good as in the form of a GOP washed up B actor (Ronnie & Arnold) or in the form of some wannabe-auty contestant backstabbing sociopath from the Klondike.
Posted by: Rose | October 22, 2008 at 10:25 AM
Oh, knock it off. This is as silly as some of the Republican "arguments"
Posted by: rogerCO | October 22, 2008 at 10:25 AM
I wonder when the reports of Michelle Obama's donated coture freebies from Oprah's designer will be mentioned by the adoring press ...
Posted by: Mary | October 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM
in reply to tommyg:
TOMMYG IS A MORON!!!!!
Posted by: mccainblows | October 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM
Wow, what a joke of a paper. You guys can't find anything on Obama worth noting? email me and I will do your job for you. Oh wait you dont want to find anything on obama, you would rather write about pointless stuff like this. You should be fired, but you wont, because your boss thinks this is good journalism. You Idiot, I hope you realize what you cost your children and our future
Posted by: pat | October 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM
in reply to tommyg:
TOMMYG IS A MORON!!!!!
Posted by: mccainblows | October 22, 2008 at 10:26 AM