All The Rage

The Image staff muses on the culture of
keeping up appearances

« Previous Post | All The Rage Home | Next Post »

Would you pay $50,000 to meet Scarlett Johansson?

March 11, 2008 |  2:32 pm

D219_2 Right now, a chance to "meet and greet" actress Scarlett Johansson--along with two tickets to a premiere--is going for $40,000 on ebay. Even more unbelievable? The auction doesn't close for another day, so someone could pay up to $75k to attend a premiere of "He's Just Not That Into You" and walk the red carpet with her. Well, maybe a foot or two anyway. The Rage noticed the fine print below the item which reads:
Q:  How long will the meet and greet last?
A:  There is no set amount of time but it is estimated to be a brief visit due to Scarlett’s schedule that evening.

Dude, count to twenty and Scarlett is gone, baby, gone. But hey, you just made a whopping tax-deductible donation to Oxfam America. Well done. Sit back, relax and enjoy the show.

photo: Oxfam America.


Post a comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this message board, but you may not participate.
Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until they've been approved.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Comments

If she'd pay $50,000 to meet me, then I'd pay $50,000 to meet her. Although I'd just as soon take her to a nice dinner at McDonalds and then to a movie.

Can I pay $50,001 not to?

Who will end up paying $50,000+ ? is my question. Just for seeing Scarlett Johansson, whoever pays that much is going to be one lucky fan, or an admirer. Hopefully its not someone who is very obsessed. Its for a good cause so i definitely support it!

Of course, I would pay $50,000 to meet Scarlett!!!


But... I haven't much money... (I'm 10)



Advertisement


Recent Posts
A $550 ax for Christmas? I pity the tool |  November 30, 2009, 5:34 pm »
Another wedding magazine bites the dust |  November 30, 2009, 12:16 pm »
Chain-strap bags: Not just for the Chanel set |  November 30, 2009, 12:12 pm »


Categories


Archives